ETHICAL DECISION RULES FOR UNCERTAIN VOTERS

[1] BADGER WW, 1971, PROBABILITY MODELS C

[2] CURTIS R, PROBABILITY MODELS C

[3] CARDINAL WELFARE, INDIVIDUALISTIC ETHICS, AND INTERPERSONAL COMPARISONS OF UTILITY [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1955, 63 (04) : 309 - 321

[4] PATTANAIK P, 1971, VOTING COLLECTIVE CH, pCH9

[5] RISK, IMPERSONALITY, AND SOCIAL WELFARE FUNCTION [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1968, 76 (06) : 1152 - 1169

[6] DECISION-RULES AND INDIVIDUAL VALUES IN CONSTITUTIONAL CHOICE [J]. AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1969, 63 (01) : 40 - 56

[7] SEN A, 1970, COLLECTIVE CHOICE SO, pCH9

[8] PROOF OF A THEOREM ON MAJORITY RULE [J]. BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1969, 14 (03): : 228 - &

[1] BADGER WW, 1971, PROBABILITY MODELS C

[2] CURTIS R, PROBABILITY MODELS C

[3] CARDINAL WELFARE, INDIVIDUALISTIC ETHICS, AND INTERPERSONAL COMPARISONS OF UTILITY [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1955, 63 (04) : 309 - 321

[4] PATTANAIK P, 1971, VOTING COLLECTIVE CH, pCH9

[5] RISK, IMPERSONALITY, AND SOCIAL WELFARE FUNCTION [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1968, 76 (06) : 1152 - 1169

[6] DECISION-RULES AND INDIVIDUAL VALUES IN CONSTITUTIONAL CHOICE [J]. AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1969, 63 (01) : 40 - 56

[7] SEN A, 1970, COLLECTIVE CHOICE SO, pCH9

[8] PROOF OF A THEOREM ON MAJORITY RULE [J]. BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1969, 14 (03): : 228 - &