IRRADIATION OF BONE METASTASES IN BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS - A RANDOMIZED STUDY WITH 1-YEAR FOLLOW-UP

被引:81
作者
RASMUSSON, B
VEJBORG, I
JENSEN, AB
ANDERSSON, M
BANNING, AM
HOFFMANN, T
PFEIFFER, P
NIELSEN, HK
SJOGREN, P
机构
[1] RIGSHOSP,DEPT ONCOL,DK-2100 COPENHAGEN,DENMARK
[2] RIGSHOSP,DEPT RADIOL,DK-2100 COPENHAGEN,DENMARK
[3] RIGSHOSP,DEPT ANAESTHESIOL,DK-2100 COPENHAGEN,DENMARK
[4] ODENSE UNIV HOSP,DEPT ONCOL,DK-5000 ODENSE C,DENMARK
[5] ODENSE UNIV HOSP,DEPT ANAESTHESIOL,DK-5000 ODENSE C,DENMARK
关键词
BONE METASTASES; BREAST CANCER; RADIOTHERAPY; RANDOMIZED TRIAL; LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP;
D O I
10.1016/0167-8140(95)01520-Q
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The results from a prospective randomized trial comparing two different radiation schedules for treatment of painful bone metastases in women with recurrent breast cancer are presented. A total of 217 patients with painful bone metastases were randomized to either 30 Grey (Gy) in ten fractions, five fractions a week (5F/W) or 15 Gy in three fractions 2F/W. The effect of treatment was evaluated by pain assessment, the radiological response and the degree of side-effects. The patients were rated at start of treatment and after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. No difference between the two radiation regimes was found, neither in achieved pain relief, improvement in level of activity and medication, nor was there any difference in radiological response and side-effects from treatment. Both regimes resulted in a significant improvement in both pain score and level of activity 1 month after treatment, an improvement which persisted during the follow-up period. We conclude that 15 Gy given in three fractions 2F/W is as effective as 30 Gy in ten fractions 5F/W, but more convenient to the patient and of less cost to society.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 184
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
CARL P, 1987, ANESTH ANALG, V66, P142
[2]   AN ISO-EFFECT TABLE FOR RADIATION TOLERANCE OF THE HUMAN SPINAL-CORD [J].
COHEN, L ;
CREDITOR, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1981, 7 (07) :961-966
[3]  
Cole D J, 1989, Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol), V1, P59, DOI 10.1016/S0936-6555(89)80035-4
[4]   EVALUATION OF RADIATION-THERAPY FOR BONE METASTASES - PAIN RELIEF AND QUALITY OF LIFE [J].
GILBERT, HA ;
KAGAN, AR ;
NUSSBAUM, H ;
RAO, AR ;
SATZMAN, J ;
CHAN, P ;
ALLEN, B ;
FORSYTHE, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1977, 129 (06) :1095-1096
[5]   A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF 4-GY OR 8-GY SINGLE DOSES IN THE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC BONE PAIN [J].
HOSKIN, PJ ;
PRICE, P ;
EASTON, D ;
REGAN, J ;
AUSTIN, D ;
PALMER, S ;
YARNOLD, JR .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1992, 23 (02) :74-78
[6]  
KAMBY C, 1987, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V60, P2524, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19871115)60:10<2524::AID-CNCR2820601030>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-3
[8]  
LEIBEL SA, 1991, RAD INJURY NERVOUS S
[9]  
MADSEN EL, 1983, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V9, P1775
[10]   BONE METASTASES - PATHOPHYSIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT POLICY [J].
NIELSEN, OS ;
MUNRO, AJ ;
TANNOCK, IF .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1991, 9 (03) :509-524