SURVIVORSHIP ANALYSIS OF THE UNCEMENTED POROUS-COATED ANATOMIC KNEE REPLACEMENT

被引:87
作者
MORAN, CG [1 ]
PINDER, IM [1 ]
LEES, TA [1 ]
MIDWINTER, MJ [1 ]
机构
[1] FREEMAN RD HOSP,DEPT ORTHOPAED SURG,NEWCASTLE TYNE NE7 7DN,TYNE & WEAR,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.2106/00004623-199173060-00007
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Ninety-six patients who had a total of 108 replacements with an uncemented porous-coated anatomic knee prosthesis were followed for an average of sixty-four months (range, thirty-nine to ninety-three months). At the time of the most recent follow-up, twenty-one implants (19 per cent) had failed, all due to problems with the tibial component. A patellar component was not used, and no noteworthy patellar problems were encountered after the operation. There were no infections about the prostheses, and no femoral implant was revised. The most common cause of failure was collapse of the anteromedial part of the tibial plateau, which occurred in fourteen knees. The prosthesis loosened without collapse of bone in two knees, and five knees were revised because of gross wear of the polyethylene. When the time of failure was defined as the point at which revision of the prosthesis was recommended, the cumulative rate of survival was 84 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval, +/- 7 per cent) at five years and 77 +/- 10 per cent at six years. When the time of failure was defined as the point at which the knee replacement was actually done, the five-year rate of survival was the same. No significant differences were demonstrated between groups that were stratified by age, sex, weight, or primary diagnosis. We therefore do not recommend the use of an uncemented porous-coated anatomic knee replacement of the design that was evaluated in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:848 / 857
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
ARMITAGE P, 1971, STATISTICAL METHODS, P408
[2]  
Branson P J, 1989, J Arthroplasty, V4, P21, DOI 10.1016/S0883-5403(89)80049-X
[3]   LOOSENING OF THE POROUS COATING IN TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT [J].
CHENG, CL ;
GROSS, AE .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1988, 70 (03) :377-381
[4]   THE LONG-TERM RESULTS OF STANMORE TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENTS [J].
GRIMER, RJ ;
KARPINSKI, MRK ;
EDWARDS, AN .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1984, 66 (01) :55-62
[5]  
HUNGERFORD DS, 1982, ORTHOP CLIN N AM, V13, P103
[6]  
HUNGERFORD DS, 1983, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V176, P95
[7]   COMPARISON OF 4 MODELS OF TOTAL KNEE-REPLACEMENT PROSTHESES [J].
INSALL, JN ;
RANAWAT, CS ;
AGLIETTI, P ;
SHINE, J .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1976, 58 (06) :754-765
[8]   THE DISTRIBUTION OF LOAD ACROSS THE KNEE - A COMPARISON OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC MEASUREMENTS [J].
JOHNSON, F ;
LEITL, S ;
WAUGH, W .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1980, 62 (03) :346-349
[9]   SURVIVAL OF KNEE ARTHROPLASTIES FOR RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS [J].
KNUTSON, K ;
TJORNSTRAND, B ;
LIDGREN, L .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1985, 56 (05) :422-425
[10]   ASSESSMENT OF THE SURVIVAL AND THE CLINICAL-RESULTS OF STANMORE TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENTS [J].
LETTIN, AWF ;
KAVANAGH, TG ;
CRAIG, D ;
SCALES, JT .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1984, 66 (03) :355-361