Single Blastocyst Transfer: Contemporary Experience

被引：1

作者：

Baw, Chin-Kun ^{[1
,2
]}

Ly, Kim Dao ^{[1
,2
]}

Kader, Amr ^{[1
,2
]}

Ahmady, Ali ^{[3
]}

Agarwa, Ashok ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] Cleveland Clin, Ctr Reprod Med, Glickman Urol & Kidney Inst, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA

[2] Cleveland Clin, Ob Gyn & Womens Hlth Inst, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA

[3] Univ Hosp Case Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA

来源：

CURRENT WOMENS HEALTH REVIEWS | 2010年 / 6卷 / 03期

关键词：

Single blastocyst transfer (SBT); embryo transfer; blastocyst grading; cryopreservation; in vitro fertilization (IVF); assisted reproductive technology (ART);

D O I：

10.2174/157340410792007127

中图分类号：

R71 [妇产科学];

学科分类号：

100211 ;

摘要：

Recent studies demonstrated an overwhelming success in single blastocyst transfer (SBT): implantation rates (IR) were 60.9%-70.5% and pregnancy rates (PR) were 60.9%-76% while the multiple pregnancy rates (MPR) were 0%-3.2%. Most of these studies involved good prognosis patients not more than 37 years of age. The results indicated that SBT decreased the number of multiple pregnancies while maintaining desirable pregnancy outcomes. However, SBT and cryopreserved single blastocyst transfer (cSBT) in the field of in vitro fertilization (IVF) are still in their infancy. Guidelines for the number of blastocysts being transferred and the techniques have not yet been standardized. The method to estimate the most viable blastocyst has not yet been proposed. The success of SBT also was found to be highly associated with the technique and patients' and clinicians' perceptions toward it.

引用

页码：219 / 226

页数：8

共 69 条

[1] The effect of pronuclear morphology on embryo quality parameters and blastocyst transfer outcome [J].

Balaban, B ;

Urman, B ;

Isiklar, A ;

Alatas, C ;

Aksoy, S ;

Mercan, R ;

Mumcu, A ;

Nuhoglu, A .

HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (11) :2357-2361

[2] Blastocyst quality affects the success of blastocyst-stage embryo transfer [J].

Balaban, B ;

Urman, B ;

Sertac, A ;

Alatas, C ;

Aksoy, S ;

Mercan, R .

FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 74 (02) :282-287

[3] Randomized comparison of two different blastocyst grading systems [J].

Balaban, B ;

Yakin, K ;

Urman, B .

FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2006, 85 (03) :559-563

[4] Factors relating to a successful cryopreserved blastocyst transfer program [J].

Behr, B ;

Gebhardt, L ;

Lyon, J ;

Milki, AA .

FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2002, 77 (04) :697-699

[5] Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception [J].

Blake, D. A. ;

Farquhar, C. M. ;

Johnson, N. ;

Proctor, M. .

COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2007, (04)

[6] The couple's decision-making in IVF: one or two embryos at transfer? [J].

Blennborn, M ;

Nilsson, S ;

Hillervik, C ;

Hellberg, D .

HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (05) :1292-1297

[7] Elective single blastocyst transfer reduces twin rates without compromising pregnancy rates [J].

Criniti, A ;

Thyer, A ;

Chow, G ;

Lin, P ;

Klein, N ;

Soules, M .

FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 84 (06) :1613-1619

[8] Monozygotic twins and transfer at the blastocyst stage after ICSI [J].

da Costa, ALE ;

Abdelmassih, S ;

de Oliveira, FG ;

Abdelmassih, V ;

Abdelmassih, R ;

Nagy, ZP ;

Balmaceda, JP .

HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (02) :333-336

[9] Factors and perceptions that influence women's decisions to have a single embryo transferred [J].

de lacey, S. ;

Davies, M. ;

Homan, G. ;

Briggs, N. ;

Norman, R. J. .

REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2007, 15 (05) :526-531

[10] Examination of frozen cycles with replacement of a single thawed blastocyst [J].

Desai, N ;

Goldfarb, J .

REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2005, 11 (03) :349-354

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →