IMPORTANCE OF SMALL WETLANDS FOR THE PERSISTENCE OF LOCAL-POPULATIONS OF WETLAND-ASSOCIATED ANIMALS

被引:255
作者
GIBBS, JP
机构
[1] School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, 06511, CT
关键词
BIRDS; FROGS; MAINE; METAPOPULATIONS; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SALAMANDERS; SMALL MAMMALS; TURTLES; WETLANDS; WETLAND ISOLATION;
D O I
10.1007/BF03160862
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
I simulated loss of small, legally unprotected freshwater wetlands in a 600 km2 area of Maine, USA to examine how loss of small wetlands altered the geometry of the wetland mosaic and thereby might affect the dynamics of metapopulations of wetland-associated organisms. Loss of small wetlands resulted in total wetland area declining by 19% (from 2032 to 1655 ha), total wetland number declining by 62% (from 354 to 136 wetlands), and average inter-wetland distance increasing by 67% (from 0.6 to 1.0 km). Also, average upland-wetland proximity decreased by 50% (0.5 to. 1.0 km), such that just 54% of the landscape was within the maximum migration distance (1000 m) of terrestrial-dwelling and aquatic-breeding amphibians after loss of small wetlands, versus 90% before loss. A spatially-structured demographic model revealed that local populations of turtles, small birds, and small mammals, stable under conditions of no wetland loss, faced a significant risk of extinction (P > 5%) after loss of small wetlands. No change in metapopulation extinction risk was evident for salamanders or frogs, largely because high rates of population increase buffered these taxa against local extinction. These results suggest that small wetlands play a greater role in the metapopulation dynamics of certain taxa of wetland animals than the modest area comprised by small wetlands might imply.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 31
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Akcakaya R., Ferson S., RAMAS/space User Manual
[2]  
spatially-structured population models for conservation biology, (1990)
[3]  
Berven K.A., Grudzien T.A., Dispersal in the wood frog (Rana sylvatica): implications for genetic population structure, Evolution, 44, pp. 2047-2056, (1990)
[4]  
Clarke R.D., Postmetamorphic survivorship of Fowler’s toad, Bufo woodhousei fowleri, Copeia, 1977, pp. 594-597, (1977)
[5]  
Clark P.J., Evans F.C., Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations, Ecology, 35, pp. 445-453, (1954)
[6]  
Congdon J.D., Breitenbach G.L., van Loben Sels R.C., Nesting ecology and hatching success in the turtle Emydoidea blandingii, Herpetologica, 39, pp. 417-429, (1983)
[7]  
Congdon J.D., Breitenbach G.L., van Loben Sels R.C., Tinkle D.W., Reproduction and nesting ecology of snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina) in southeastern Michigan, Herpetologica, 43, pp. 39-54, (1987)
[8]  
Congdon J.D., Greene J.L., Gibbons J.W., Biomass of freshwater turtles: a geographic comparison, American Midland Naturalist, 115, pp. 165-173, (1986)
[9]  
Cowardin L.M., Carter V., Golet F.C., LaRoe E.T., Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States, (1979)
[10]  
Dodd C.K., Effects of habitat fragmentation on a streamdwelling species, the flattened musk turtle Sternotherus depressus, Biological Conservation, 45, pp. 33-45, (1990)