LEVEL OF ANASTOMOSIS AND ANORECTAL MANOMETRY IN PREDICTING FUNCTION FOLLOWING ANTERIOR RESECTION FOR ADENOCARCINOMA

被引:57
作者
HO, YH
WONG, J
GOH, HS
机构
[1] Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, 0316, Outram Road
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF00341193
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The clinical and physiological consequences of sphincter preservation after resection of rectal carcinoma at various levels were evaluated. Thirty-two patients (mean age 59.2 years; range 31-79 years) who had undergone curative surgery at least one year previously and were not given adjuvant therapy, were studied with 19 normal controls. Three blinded observers independently assessed clinical sphincter function, level of anastomosis (ANL) and anorectal manometry. 85.7% had an increase in stool frequency but their normal lifestyles were unaffected. The mean stool frequency was 3.1 (range 2 to 8) times/day. The anal maximal basal and maximum squeeze pressures, rectal volume of first sensation (VIS) and urge, maximum tolerable volume and compliance were all significantly impaired (P < 0.05). Patients with poorer function had significantly lower ANLs (P < 0.05). On multiple regression analysis, the ANL and the VIS significantly predicted stool frequency (P < 0.05). ANL below 6 cm was significantly associated with impaired frequency of stools (P < 0.05). This may be a subgroup of patients whose residual rectal reservoir function is compromised and may theoretically benefit from colonic pouches.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 174
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Gillen P., Peel A.L.G., Comparison of the mortality, morbidity and incidence of local recurrence in patients with rectal cancer treated by either stapled anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection, Br J Surg, 73, pp. 339-341, (1986)
[2]  
Willia D.S., Durdey P., Johnston D., The outcome following sphincter-saving resection and abdomino-perineal resection for low rectal cancer, Br J Surg, 72, pp. 595-598, (1985)
[3]  
Phillips R.K.S., Hittinger R., Blesovsky L., Fry J.S., Fielding L.P., Local recurrence following ‘curative’ surgery for large bowel cancer. II. The rectum and rectosigmoid, Br J Surg, 71, pp. 17-20, (1984)
[4]  
McDonald P.J., Heald R.J., A survey of postoperative function after rectal anastomosis with circular stapling devices, Br J Surg, 70, pp. 727-729, (1983)
[5]  
Nakahara S., Itoh H., Mibu R., Ikeda S., Oohata Y., Kitano K., Nakamura Y., Clinical and manometric evaluation of anorectal function following low anterior resection with low anastomotic line using an EEA stapler for rectal cancer, Dis Colon Rectum, 31, pp. 762-766, (1988)
[6]  
Batignani G., Monaci I., Ficari F., Tonelli F., What affects continence after anterior resection of the rectum?, Dis Colon Rectum, 34, pp. 329-335, (1991)
[7]  
Horgan F.G., O'Connel P.R., Shinkwin C.A., Kirwan W.O., Effect of anterior resection on anal sphincter function, Br J Surg, 76, pp. 783-786, (1989)
[8]  
Pederson K., Hint K., Olsen J., Christiansen H.N., Jensen P., Mortensen P.E., Anorectal function after low anterior resection for carcinoma, Annals of Surgery, 204, pp. 133-135, (1986)
[9]  
Carmona J.A., Ortiz H., Perez-Cabanas I., Alterations in anorectal function after anterior resection for cancer of the rectum, Int J Colorect Dis, 6, pp. 108-110, (1991)
[10]  
Molloy R.G., Moran K.T., Coulter J., Waldron R., Kirwan W.O., Mechanism of sphincter impairment following low anterior resection, Dis Colon Rectum, 35, pp. 462-464, (1992)