RETHINKING SCIENCE-EDUCATION - BEYOND PIAGETIAN CONSTRUCTIVISM TOWARD A SOCIOCULTURAL MODEL OF TEACHING AND LEARNING

被引:169
作者
OLOUGHLIN, M
机构
[1] Department of Curriculum arid Teaching, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York
关键词
D O I
10.1002/tea.3660290805
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In the first part of the article I present an epistemological critique of forms of pedagogy founded on Piagetian constructivism. Despite the appeal of the notion that learners construct their understanding, I argue that constructivism is problematic because it ignores the subjectivity of the learner and the socially and historically situated nature of knowing; it denies the essentially collaborative and social nature of meaning making; and it privileges only one form of knowledge, namely, the technical rational. I then present a critique of active learning and student-centered forms of pedagogy. I argue that in our models of teaching we rely on too many unexamined assumptions from developmental psychology and we take for granted the problematic notion that children learn by doing. My central thesis is hat constructivism is flawed because of its inability to come to grips with the essential issues of culture, power, and discourse in the classroom. In the concluding section of the article I present a preliminary account of a sociocultural approach to teaching and learning that takes seriously the notion that learning is situated in contexts, that students bring their own subjectivities and cultural perspectives to bear in constructing understanding, that issues of power exist in the classroom that need to be addressed, and that education into scientific ways of knowing requires understanding modes of classroom discourse and enabling students to negotiate these modes effectively so that they may master and critique scientific ways of knowing without, in the process, sacrificing their own personally and culturally constructed ways of knowing.
引用
收藏
页码:791 / 820
页数:30
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1987, ROAD STRUCTURE
[2]  
Bachtin Mikhail., 1986, SPEECH GENRES OTHER
[3]  
Bakhtin Mikhail, 2010, DIALOGIC IMAGINATION
[4]  
Barnes D., 1976, COMMUNICATION CURRIC
[5]   PIAGET STRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENTAL-PSYCHOLOGY .1. PIAGET AND STRUCTURALISM [J].
BROUGHTON, JM .
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 1981, 24 (02) :78-109
[6]   PIAGET STRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENTAL-PSYCHOLOGY .2. LOGIC AND PSYCHOLOGY [J].
BROUGHTON, JM .
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 1981, 24 (03) :195-224
[8]   PIAGET STRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENTAL-PSYCHOLOGY .4. KNOWLEDGE WITHOUT A SELF AND WITHOUT HISTORY [J].
BROUGHTON, JM .
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 1981, 24 (05) :320-346
[9]   PIAGET STRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENTAL-PSYCHOLOGY .3. FUNCTION AND THE PROBLEM OF KNOWLEDGE [J].
BROUGHTON, JM .
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 1981, 24 (04) :257-285
[10]  
Broughton JM, 1987, CRITICAL THEORIES PS