ABROGATING CHEMOTHERAPY-INDUCED MYELOSUPPRESSION BY RECOMBINANT GRANULOCYTE-MACROPHAGE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR IN PATIENTS WITH SARCOMA - PROTECTION AT THE PROGENITOR-CELL LEVEL

被引:117
作者
VADHANRAJ, S
BROXMEYER, HE
HITTELMAN, WN
PAPADOPOULOS, NE
CHAWLA, SP
FENOGLIO, C
COOPER, S
BUESCHER, ES
FRENCK, RW
HOLIAN, A
PERKINS, RC
SCHEULE, RK
GUTTERMAN, JU
SALEM, P
BENJAMIN, RS
机构
[1] UNIV TEXAS,MD ANDERSON CANC CTR,DEPT MED ONCOL,HOUSTON,TX 77030
[2] INDIANA UNIV,SCH MED,WALTHER ONCOL CTR,INDIANAPOLIS,IN 46202
[3] INDIANA UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT MED,INDIANAPOLIS,IN 46202
[4] INDIANA UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT MICROBIOL,INDIANAPOLIS,IN 46202
[5] INDIANA UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT IMMUNOL,INDIANAPOLIS,IN 46202
[6] UNIV TEXAS,SCH MED,DEPT PEDIAT,HOUSTON,TX 77025
[7] UNIV TEXAS,SCH MED,DEPT INTERNAL MED,HOUSTON,TX 77025
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1992.10.8.1266
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to optimize the dose, schedule, and timing of recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) administration that would best abrogate myelosuppression in patients with sarcoma. Patients and Methods: Sarcoma patients who had experienced severe myelosuppression after chemotherapy with Cytoxan (cyclophosphamide; Bristol-Myers Squibb Co, Evansville, IN), Adriamycin (doxorubicin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), and dacarbazine ([CyADIC], cycle 1) were eligible. GM-CSF was administered during a 14-day period until 1 week before cycle 2 of CyADIC and was resumed 2 days after cycle 2 completion. The schedule subsequently was modified to allow the earlier administration of GM-CSF in which CyADIC was compressed from 5 days to 3 days, and GM-CSF was administered immediately after the discontinuation of CyADIC in cycle 2. To understand better the impact of GM-CSF on bone marrow stem cells, the proliferative status of bone marrow progenitors was examined during treatment. To evaluate the effects of GM-CSF on effector cells, select functions of mature myeloid cells were also examined. Results: In the seven patients who were treated on the initial schedule, GM-CSF enhanced the rate of neutrophil recovery; however, severe neutropenia was not abrogated. By using the modified schedule in 17 patients, GM-CSF significantly reduced both the degree and the duration of neutropenia and myeloid (neutrophils, eosinophils, and monocytes) leukopenia. The mean neutrophil and mature myeloid nadir counts were 100/mm3 and 280/mm3 in cycle 1 and 290/mm3 and 1,540/mm3 in cycle 2 (P < .01 and P < .001). The duration of severe neutropenia (neutrophil count < 500/mm3) and myeloid leukopenia (myeloid leukocyte count 1,000/mm3) were reduced from 6.2 and 6.8 days in cycle 1 to 2.8 and 1.4 days in cycle 2 (P < .001). While 16 of 17 patients experienced severe myeloid leukopenia (< 500/mm3) in cycle 1, only two of 17 experienced severe myeloid leukopenia in cycle 2 (P < .001). Overall, severe neutropenia was abrogated in seven patients, which made them eligible for dose-escalation of Adriamycin. The fraction of cycling progenitors increased threefold on GM-CSF and decreased dramatically below the baseline within 1 day of GM-CSF discontinuation. Conclusions: The modified schedule improved the beneficial effects of GM-CSF by enhancing myeloprotection and permitting dose-intensification of chemotherapy. The increased myeloid mass and quiescent progenitors at the initiation of chemotherapy suggest that GM-CSF might allow further chemotherapy dose-rate intensification by shortening the interval between courses. © 1992 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:1266 / 1277
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   KINETICS OF HUMAN HEMATOPOIETIC-CELLS AFTER INVIVO ADMINISTRATION OF GRANULOCYTE-MACROPHAGE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR [J].
AGLIETTA, M ;
PIACIBELLO, W ;
SANAVIO, F ;
STACCHINI, A ;
APRA, F ;
SCHENA, M ;
MOSSETTI, C ;
CARNINO, F ;
CALIGARISCAPPIO, F ;
GAVOSTO, F .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1989, 83 (02) :551-557
[2]   EFFECT OF RECOMBINANT HUMAN GRANULOCYTE MACROPHAGE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR ON CHEMOTHERAPY-INDUCED MYELOSUPPRESSION [J].
ANTMAN, KS ;
GRIFFIN, JD ;
ELIAS, A ;
SOCINSKI, MA ;
RYAN, L ;
CANNISTRA, SA ;
OETTE, D ;
WHITLEY, M ;
FREI, E ;
SCHNIPPER, LE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1988, 319 (10) :593-598
[3]  
BENJAMIN RS, 1974, CANCER, V33, P19, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197401)33:1<19::AID-CNCR2820330107>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-M
[5]  
BENJAMIN RS, 1983, SOFT TISSUE SARCOMAS, P109
[6]  
BODEY G, 1991, CANCER, V47, P2422
[7]   PHASE-I/II STUDY OF RECOMBINANT HUMAN GRANULOCYTE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR IN PATIENTS RECEIVING INTENSIVE CHEMOTHERAPY FOR SMALL CELL LUNG-CANCER [J].
BRONCHUD, MH ;
SCARFFE, JH ;
THATCHER, N ;
CROWTHER, D ;
SOUZA, LM ;
ALTON, NK ;
TESTA, NG ;
DEXTER, TM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1987, 56 (06) :809-813
[8]  
BROXMEYER HE, 1992, AM J PEDIAT HEMATOL, V14, P22
[9]  
BROXMEYER HE, 1989, EXP HEMATOL, V17, P455
[10]   PRECLINICAL AND CLINICAL-STUDIES WITH THE HEMATOPOIETIC COLONY-STIMULATING FACTORS AND RELATED INTERLEUKINS [J].
BROXMEYER, HE ;
VADHANRAJ, S .
IMMUNOLOGIC RESEARCH, 1989, 8 (03) :185-201