SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA OF THE PENIS .4. PROGNOSTIC FACTORS OF SURVIVAL - ANALYSIS OF TUMOR, NODES AND METASTASIS CLASSIFICATION-SYSTEM

被引:170
作者
HORENBLAS, S [1 ]
VANTINTEREN, H [1 ]
机构
[1] ANTONI VAN LEEUWENHOEK ZIEKENHUIS,NETHERLANDS CANC INST,DEPT BIOMET,AMSTERDAM,NETHERLANDS
关键词
PENILE NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA; SQUAMOUS CELL; NEOPLASM STAGING; NEOPLASM METASTASIS;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(17)35221-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Various prognostic factors of survival were assessed in 118 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis treated at The Netherlands Cancer Institute between 1956 and 1989. Using the clinical parameters of the tumor, nodes and metastasis classification system of the International Union Against Cancer (1978 version) and a differentiation system consisting of 3 grades the prognostic relevance for survival was analyzed. T category, N category and grade of differentiation showed statistical significance in the univariate analysis. Patients with small tumors, clinically negative nodes and well differentiated tumors showed a favorable prognosis. Only N category and grade were independent prognostic factors of survival using the Cox proportional hazards model. On the basis of the survival analysis a stage grouping consisting of 3 stages is proposed with 5-year survival probabilities for stages 1, 2 and 3 of 93%, 55% and 30%, respectively. A revised version of the tumor, nodes and metastasis system was introduced in 1987. This latest version was analyzed with the previous method, which was used in this report, and prognostically important and clinically useful parameters, such as the size of the primary tumor and evidence of fixation of the regional lymph nodes, have been discarded. The changes in the revised version seem to have little relevance to clinical staging. The revised version should be considered a histopathological classification only.
引用
收藏
页码:1239 / 1243
页数:5
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   OUTCOME, COMPLICATIONS AND FOLLOW-UP IN SURGICALLY TREATED SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA OF THE VULVA 1956-1982 [J].
ANSINK, AC ;
VANTINTEREN, H ;
AARTSEN, EJ ;
HEINTZ, APM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1991, 42 (02) :137-143
[2]   CARCINOMA OF PENIS [J].
BAKER, BH ;
SPRATT, JS ;
PEREZMESA, C ;
WATSON, FR ;
LEDUC, RJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1976, 116 (04) :458-461
[3]  
BASSETT JW, 1952, CANCER, V5, P530, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(195205)5:3<530::AID-CNCR2820050315>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-9
[5]  
DARAI E, 1988, ANN CHIR, V42, P748
[6]  
DEKERNIO.JB, 1973, CANCER, V32, P1256, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197311)32:5<1256::AID-CNCR2820320534>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-G
[8]  
EKSTROM T, 1958, Acta Chir Scand, V115, P25
[9]   REAPPRAISAL OF THE ROLE OF RADIOTHERAPY AND SURGERY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF CARCINOMA OF THE PENIS [J].
ELDEMIRY, MIM ;
OLIVER, RTD ;
HOPESTONE, HF ;
BLANDY, JP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1984, 56 (06) :724-728
[10]  
FRALEY EE, 1985, CANCER, V55, P1618, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19850401)55:7<1618::AID-CNCR2820550735>3.0.CO