Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Dwell Times A Comparison of 3 Securement Methods for Implementation of a 96-Hour Scheduled Change Protocol

被引:40
作者
Smith, Bonnie [1 ]
机构
[1] Holmes Reg Med Ctr, Therapy Dept 4, 1350 South Hickory St, Melbourne, FL 32901 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00129804-200601000-00004
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
A prospective, sequential clinical trial was undertaken to determine whether any of 3 methods of peripheral IV catheter (PIV) securement could extend the average survival time of such catheters sufficiently to allow the implementation of a 96-hour PIV change-protocol. Nonsterile tape, StatLock, and HubGuard were evaluated. The use of nonsterile tape securement resulted in an 8% PIV survival rate, HubGuard produced a 9% PIV survival rate, and Statlock produced a 52% PIV survival rate (P < .001). Although this study was not a randomized, controlled trial, it strongly suggests that a mechanical catheter securement device, as opposed to tape or die-cut tape, can render practicable the implementation of the 96-hour PIV change protocol that was sanctioned by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 17
页数:4
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]  
Bierman S, 2003, ICT, V7
[2]  
*CDCP, 2002, MMWR MORB MORTAL WKL, V51
[3]  
Royer T., 2003, J ASS VASC ACCESS, V8
[4]  
Schears G, 2005, LEAD EDG S APR
[5]  
Sheppard K, 1999, J Intraven Nurs, V22, P151
[6]  
Wood D, 1997, J Intraven Nurs, V20, P280