PATIENT AND GENERAL-PRACTITIONER PERCEPTIONS OF PATIENT-HELD HEALTH RECORDS

被引:26
作者
LIAW, ST
机构
[1] NH and MRC Public Health Research Fellow, Flinders University, South Australia, 5042, Bedford Park
关键词
D O I
10.1093/fampra/10.4.406
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to describe the attitudes of general practitioners (GPs) and their patients to patient-held health records (PHR). The study was set in a general practice in South Australia. It consisted of a descriptive study using a mail questionnaire. A stratified random sample, based on socioeconomic indicators for areas in South Australia, of GPs (n = 315) and their patients (n = 500) was used. The indices for contents, problems and benefits of the PHR showed adequate internal consistency and reliability. Patients mostly perceived the PHR as a personal document for reference while GPs perceived it as a management and communication tool. The solo GP who scored high on the 'PHR benefits' and low on the 'PHR problems' indices, and doubted that GPs were influential in changing patient behaviour would let patients keep full copies of their records. The younger female rural GP who scored high on the 'PHR benefits' and low on the 'PHR problems' indices favoured a patient summary. The more entrepreneurial GPs who scored high on both the 'PHR benefits' and 'PHR problems' indices favoured a 'censored summary'. Awareness of smart cards was high and opinions on their use guarded. It was concluded that patients and doctors have different attitudes to and expectations of PHRs. Significant sociodemographic, educational and attitude correlations with PHRs were found. The 'PHR benefits' and 'PHR problems' indices were consistent, useful and may have a wider applicability in quantifying the opinion of patients and providers before implementing PHR programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:406 / 415
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Weiss S.J., Consensual norms regarding patient involve- mem, Soc Sci Med, 22, pp. 489-496, (1986)
[2]  
Gawthorn E.C., The "manual for general practice" and the patient involvemeni, Aust Fam Physician, 10, pp. 621-623, (1981)
[3]  
Sennayake I.P., Use of home based records in the evalua- tion of a health care system, Env Child Health, pp. 220-223, (1977)
[4]  
Shah P.M., Shah K.P., Belsey M.A., The home-based mater- nal record. A tool for family involvement in health care, Int Planned Parenthood Fed Med Bull, pp. 2-3, (1983)
[5]  
Miller K., Barker M., An Evaluation of the Use of Personal Health Records. Report of a Study Undertaken in the Modbury Area, (1978)
[6]  
Saffin K., Macfarlane A., How well are parent-held records kept and completed?, Br J Gen Pract, 41, pp. 249-251, (1991)
[7]  
Dietrich A.J., Duhamel M., Improving geriatric preventive care through a patient-held checklist, Fam Med, 21, pp. 195-198, (1989)
[8]  
McGhee S.M., Hedley A.J., Jones R.B., Et al., A computer- based shared-care scheme for hypertension in Glasgow: Feasibility and acceptability, Medical Informatics Europe '90. Proceedings. Glasgow, Scotland, Aug 20-23, pp. 553-556, (1990)
[9]  
Hall M.S., Hopkins R.J., Report of the Care Card Trial In- Cluding Evaluation, (1990)
[10]  
Woodward C.A., Curry L., The Health Encounter Card Pilot Project: An innovation in Health Care, Manchester University: Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, (1992)