COMING TO TERMS WITH THE FIELD - UNDERSTANDING AND DOING ORGANIZATIONAL ETHNOGRAPHY

被引:162
作者
ROSEN, M
机构
[1] Sundered Ground, Inc.
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-6486.1991.tb00268.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article argues that ethnography is inadequately understood and recognized within administration science as a method for studying organizational culture. Ethnographic analyses of organizational cultures are largely absent from the administration science literature, primarily because such work derives from a social constructionist understanding of science. The knowledge of organizations thus provided is interpretive, denying the subject—object dichotomy inherent in mainstream empiricist applications of social analysis. In addition, whereas ethnographic analysis and writing is an appropriate method for studying culture, organizational ethnography is substantially different from ethnographic studies of whole (and largely foreign) societies. Formal organizations are both partial and specialized in comparison to general societal organization. The conceptual and practical toolkit the organizational ethnographer brings to the field and the writing table is thus tailored to this particular research arena, and is outlined here. Copyright © 1991, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 24
页数:24
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Agar M.H., 1996, PROFESSIONAL STRANGE, V2
[2]  
ASTLEY WG, 1985, ADM SCI Q, V20, P497
[3]  
Barnard CI, 1938, FUNCT EXECUTIVE
[4]  
Berger P. L., 1966, SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION
[5]  
BERNSTEIN R, 1986, PRAXIS INT, V6, P235
[6]  
Clifford James, 1986, WRITING CULTURE POET, DOI [10.1525/9780520946286, DOI 10.1525/9780520946286-003]
[7]  
Cohen A., 1974, 2 DIMENSIONAL MAN ES
[8]  
CONKLIN H, 1968, INT EXCYCLOPEDIA SOC, V5
[9]   CRITICAL-CULTURAL RESEARCH - NEW SENSIBILITIES AND OLD REALITIES [J].
DEETZ, S .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1985, 11 (02) :121-136
[10]  
Denzin N. K., 1983, METHOD STRATEGIES SO, P129