DYNAMIC INCREMENTAL CT - EFFECT OF VOLUME AND CONCENTRATION OF CONTRAST MATERIAL AND PATIENT WEIGHT ON HEPATIC ENHANCEMENT

被引:258
作者
HEIKEN, JP
BRINK, JA
MCCLENNAN, BL
SAGEL, SS
CROWE, TM
GAINES, MV
机构
[1] Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110
关键词
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CT); CONTRAST MEDIA; LIVER; CT; LIVER NEOPLASMS;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.195.2.7724752
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
PURPOSE: To develop an individualized approach to the intravenous administration of contrast material for hepatic computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred patients were randomized into eight protocols. Each group received different volumes and concentrations of contrast material. For each protocol, maximum hepatic enhancement (MHE) was calculated, with an adjustment for iodine dose and patient weight The contrast enhancement index (CEI) and optimum scanning interval were calculated for hepatic enhancement thresholds of 10-60 HU. RESULTS: The MHE calculated as a function of patient weight was 96 HU +/- 19 per gram of iodine per kilogram of body weight. CEIs obtained with a contrast material concentration of 240 mg of iodine per milliliter were inferior to those obtained with a concentration of 320 or 350 mg I/mL. At low enhancement thresholds, the volume of contrast material had a more important effect than the concentration on CEI and optimum scanning interval; at high thresholds, concentration had a more important effect. CONCLUSION: For a patient of known weight, one can calculate the iodine dose needed to provide a desired level of hepatic enhancement. Use of a contrast material with a concentration of 240 mg I/mL is not recommended for dynamic incremental hepatic CT, except in small patients (eg, those weighing less than 73 kg).
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 357
页数:5
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]
CONTRAST MATERIAL FOR COMBINED ABDOMINAL AND PELVIC CT - CAN COST BE REDUCED BY INCREASING THE CONCENTRATION AND DECREASING THE VOLUME [J].
BAKER, ME ;
BEAM, C ;
LEDER, R ;
GULLIVER, D ;
PAINE, SS ;
DUNNICK, NR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1993, 160 (03) :637-641
[2]
COMPARISON OF CONTRAST-MEDIA INJECTION RATES AND VOLUMES FOR HEPATIC DYNAMIC INCREMENTED COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY [J].
BERLAND, LL ;
LEE, JY .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1988, 23 (12) :918-922
[3]
BRINK JA, 1994, RADIOLOGY, V193, P165
[4]
BOLUS GEOMETRY AND DYNAMICS AFTER INTRAVENOUS CONTRAST-MEDIUM INJECTION [J].
CLAUSSEN, CD ;
BANZER, D ;
PFRETZSCHNER, C ;
KALENDER, WA ;
SCHORNER, W .
RADIOLOGY, 1984, 153 (02) :365-368
[5]
HEPATIC CT CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT - EFFECT OF DOSE, DURATION OF INFUSION, AND TIME ELAPSED FOLLOWING INFUSION [J].
DEAN, PB ;
VIOLANTE, MR ;
MAHONEY, JA .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1980, 15 (02) :158-161
[6]
DYNAMIC HEPATIC CT [J].
FOLEY, WD .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 170 (03) :617-622
[7]
EFFECT OF VARYING RATES OF LOW-OSMOLARITY CONTRAST-MEDIA INJECTION FOR HEPATIC CT - CORRELATION WITH INDOCYANINE GREEN TRANSIT-TIME [J].
HARMON, BH ;
BERLAND, LL ;
LEE, JY .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 184 (02) :379-382
[8]
DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED CT OF THE LIVER - COMPARISON OF CONTRAST-MEDIUM INJECTION RATES AND UNIPHASIC AND BIPHASIC INJECTION PROTOCOLS [J].
HEIKEN, JP ;
BRINK, JA ;
MCCLENNAN, BL ;
SAGEL, SS ;
FORMAN, HP ;
DICROCE, J .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 187 (02) :327-331
[9]
DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT OF THE UPPER ABDOMEN - EFFECT OF CONTRAST-MEDIUM AND BODY-WEIGHT [J].
KORMANO, M ;
PARTANEN, K ;
SOIMAKALLIO, S ;
KIVIMAKI, T .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1983, 18 (04) :364-367