THE CHANGING AGE DISTRIBUTION IN INDONESIA AND SOME CONSEQUENCES

被引:3
作者
NAM, CB
DASVARMA, GL
RAHARDJO, SP
机构
[1] POPULAT COUNCIL,JAKARTA,INDONESIA
[2] UNIV INDONESIA,JAKARTA,INDONESIA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00074919112331336028
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
Beginning with a discussion of the sources and quality of Indonesian age data by sex, this paper examines the changes in the functional age groups of the population of Indonesia from 1971 to the year 2005, and the implications of these changes for education, labour force participation, dependency ratios and fertility. Data for the period 1971 to 1985 are based on actual enumerations, while those for the period 1990 to 2005 are based on projections. Although the provisional totals of the 1990 Census had been released before the publication of this paper, their breakdown by age was still not available. The functional age categories discussed in the paper include the pre-school years, the primary and intermediate school ages, the teenage years, the reproductive ages of women, the principal working ages and the post-work years. It concludes with a discussion of various policy and planning implications of these changes. © 1991, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 136
页数:16
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
AHMAD S, 1984, 19 AUSTR NAT U DEP D
[2]  
ANDERSON BR, 1972, JAVA TIME REVOLUTION, pCH1
[3]  
Feeney G, 1979, Asian Pac Cens Forum, V5, P12
[4]  
*GAR GAR BES HAL N, 1988, BROAD GUID STAT POL
[5]  
GARDINER P, 1983, WORKING PAPER SERIES, V26
[6]  
*INDON BIR PUS STA, 1985, TRENDS CHAR AGE POP
[7]  
Iskandar N., 1970, SOME MONOGRAPHIC STU
[8]   PUTTING TRAINED LABOR POWER TO WORK - THE DILEMMA OF EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT [J].
KEYFITZ, N .
BULLETIN OF INDONESIAN ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1989, 25 (03) :35-55
[9]   SOME CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF CENSUS AGE DISTRIBUTIONS IN ILLITERATE POPULATIONS - REPLY [J].
KEYFITZ, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1966, 71 (05) :556-557
[10]   AGE DISTRIBUTION AS A CHALLENGE TO DEVELOPMENT [J].
KEYFITZ, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1965, 70 (06) :659-668