STAGING OF PROSTATE-CANCER

被引:106
作者
BOSTWICK, DG
MYERS, RP
OESTERLING, JE
机构
[1] Departments of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
[2] Departments of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
来源
SEMINARS IN SURGICAL ONCOLOGY | 1994年 / 10卷 / 01期
关键词
PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND; CARCINOMA; TNM; STAGING; PROGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1002/ssu.2980100110
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The clinical and pathologic staging of prostate cancer involves determination of the anatomic extent and burden of tumor based on the best available data. Two major classification schemes are currently used: the modified American system and the TNM system [primary tumor (T), regional lymph node (N), and metastases (M)]. Both systems stratify patients according to the method of tumor detection, separating nonpalpable ''incidental'' prostate cancers detected during transurethral resection for clinically benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and palpable cancers detected by digital rectal examination. These staging systems also recognize nonpalpable tumors detected by an elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level or an abnormal transrectal ultrasound image. Current staging is limited by a significant level of clinical understaging (up to 59%, in our experience) and over-staging ( up to 5%) according to comparison with pathologic examination of resected specimens. Proposed improvements in staging include preoperative systematic sextant biopsies to assess tumor volume, volume-based prognostic index, and a multiple prognostic index. In this report, we evaluate the current aspects of clinical and pathologic staging of prostate cancer with emphasis on the early stages in which there is the greatest chance of cure. (C) 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 72
页数:13
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Boring CC, Squires TS, Tong T, Cancer statistics, 1993, CA Cancer J Clin, 43, pp. 7-26, (1993)
  • [2] Shroder FH, Hermanek P, Denis L, Et al., The TNM classification of prostate carcinoma, Prostate, 4, pp. 129-138, (1992)
  • [3] Friedman GD, Hiatt RA, Quesenberry CP, Selby JV, Case‐control study of screening for prostate cancer by digital rectal examinations, Lancet, 337, pp. 1526-1529, (1991)
  • [4] Oesterling JE, Suman VJ, Zincke H, Bostwick DG, PSA‐detected (Clinical stage Tlc or B0) prostate cancer: Pathologically significant tumors, Urol Clin North Am, 20, pp. 687-693, (1993)
  • [5] Catalona WJ, Whitmore WF, New staging systems for prostate cancer, J Urol, 142, pp. 1302-1304, (1989)
  • [6] Lee F, Torp-Pedersen S, Littrup PJ, Et al., Hypoechoic lesions of the prostate: Clinical relevance of tumor size, digital rectal examination, and prostate‐specific antigen, Radiology, 170, pp. 29-32, (1989)
  • [7] Fleming C, Wasson J, Albertson PC, Et al., A decision analysis of alternative treatment strategies for clinically localized prostate cancer, JAMA, 269, pp. 2650-2658, (1993)
  • [8] Whitmore WF, Management of clinically localized prostatic cancer. An unresolved problem, JAMA, 269, pp. 2676-2677, (1993)
  • [9] Scardino PT, Weaver R, Hudson MA, Early detection of prostate cancer, Hum Pathol, 23, pp. 211-222, (1992)
  • [10] Thompson IM, Zeidman EJ, Extended followup of stage Al carcinoma of the prostate, Urology, 33, pp. 455-458, (1989)