CELLULAR INVASION ON HYDROGEL AND POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE) IMPLANTS AN INVIVO STUDY

被引:59
作者
AMON, M
MENAPACE, R
机构
关键词
BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELLULAR REACTION; FOREIGN-BODY GIANT CELL; HYDROGEL INTRAOCULAR LENS; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); SPECULAR MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PRECIPITATE;
D O I
10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80410-5
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Over a two-year postoperative period, cells on hydrogel (poly HEMA) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) intraocular lenses (IOLs) were observed by specular microscopy. First small, round cells and fibroblast-like cells and later epithelioid-like cells and foreign-body giant cells could be seen on both IOL types. In eyes with prolonged postoperative inflammation a greater number of cells was observed and the cells remained on the IOL surface for a longer period. We found fewer cell reactions on hydrogel IOLs during the postoperative period of our follow-up. Foreign-body giant cells were observed on only 9%. These cells were smaller than those on PMMA IOLs. This finding may suggest that poly HEMA demonstrates greater biocompatibility, with regard to this foreign-body cell reaction, than PMMA. However, we found more pigment dispersion (50%) on the surface of hydrogel IOLs. These pigment deposits induced no cell reactions and there was less phagocytosis of the pigment debris. In 7% of the cases, dust-like, white precipitates of uncertain origin were seen; in 5% amorphous debris was seen. Fine scratches caused by polishing during the manufacturing process were seen in some cases. The postoperative clinical signs for PMMA and hydrogel IOLs were similar.
引用
收藏
页码:774 / 779
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Wenzel M, Reim M, Heinze M, Bocking A, Cellular invasion on the surface of intraocular lenses. In vivo cytological observations following lens implantation, Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 226, pp. 449-454, (1988)
  • [2] Yamanaka A, Kazusa R, Takayama S, Cells on the various kinds of intraocular lens implants, Eur J Implant Refract Surg, 1, pp. 15-17, (1989)
  • [3] Wolter JR, Lens implant cytology, Ophthalmic Surg, 13, pp. 939-942, (1982)
  • [4] Ohara K, Biomicroscopy of surface deposits resembling foreign-body giant cells on implanted intraocular lenses, Am J Ophthalmol, 99, pp. 304-311, (1985)
  • [5] Vogt A, Lehrbuch und Atlas der Spaltlampenmikroskopie des lebenden Auges, (1930)
  • [6] Wenzel M, Hahn J, Pigment auf Intraokularlinsen. Sitzungsbericht der 150, Versamm1ung des Vereins Rheinisch-Westfälischer Augenärzte, pp. 261-268, (1988)
  • [7] Wenzel M, Brab M, Reim M, Boecking A, Inflammatory reactions against intraocular lenses: in vivo cytological differentiation, Eur J Implant Refract Surg, 1, pp. 89-94, (1989)
  • [8] Wenzel M, Heinze M, Reim M, Membranen auf Intraokularlinsen - Gewebsdifferenzierungen in vivo, Fortschr Ophthalmol, 85, pp. 277-279, (1988)
  • [9] Menapace R, Skorpik, Wedrich A, Evaluation of 150 consecutive cases of poly HEMA posterior chamber lenses implanted in the bag using a small-incision technique, J Cataract Refract Surg, 16, pp. 567-577, (1990)
  • [10] Menapace R, Skorpik, Tecknik der Kleinschnitt-Implantation und Kapselsackfixation für die flexible pHema-Linse IOGEL PC-12, 3. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Intraokularlinsen Implantation, pp. 130-138, (1990)