Quality assurance in engineering education on a national and European scale

被引:4
作者
Gola, Muzio M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Torino, Dipartimento Meccan, I-10129 Turin, Italy
关键词
Quality Assessment; Transparency Enhanced Mobility; Recognition Quality Assurance;
D O I
10.1080/03043790500213094
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Activity 2 of project E4, "Quality Assessment and Transparency for Enhanced Mobility and Trans-European Recognition", included the working group on "Quality Assurance in Engineering on a National and European Scale". Its report can be found in Part 2 of Volume D, final report of the E4 Thematic Network (Firenze University Press 2003). The Report of this Working Group is formed by three parts. Chapter 2 explores the horizon of evaluation, and briefly summarizes evaluation mandate, focus and procedures in the light of quality and quality assurance, accreditation, responsibility, with particular reference to higher education. Chapter 3 explores the ideas from a number of European evaluation models for higher education, and shows that their contents can be read in the frame of four fundamental "aspects" or "dimensions" of quality: Requirements, objectives Teaching, learning, assessment Learning resources Monitoring, analysis, improvement Chapter 4 underlines that a Programme should be evaluated on the basis of its ability to put into effect a policy focusing - clearly and distinctly - on the external and internal efficacy of the learning process: specify worthwhile learning goals and enable most students to achieve the established objectives. The set of "aspects" examined in Chapter 3 is expanded into a minimum set of "factors", that the Programme should address in a stable manner before it is submitted to an external evaluation. In developing this activity, a selection of a few representative models was examined, bringing out the essential structure that they have in common. The reference documents can be found in the References section of this article. What follows is extracted from the conclusions of Chapter 4.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 430
页数:8
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
CNVSU-MIUR, 2001, ACCCR CORS STUD
[2]  
Consejo de Universidades, 2002, 2 PLAN CAL U GUIA EV
[3]  
Estonia-Quality Assessment Council, 1998, STAND ACCR ED PROGR
[4]  
*ISO, 90012000 ISO
[5]  
Phare/ ETF, 1998, QUAL ASS HIGH ED MAN
[6]  
QAA, 2000, QAA HDB AC REV
[7]  
SECAI (Sistema de EvaluacIon de la Calidad de las ensen anzas de Ingenieria), CRE COLUMBUS
[8]  
Sparkes J., 1999, PROPOSAL FORMALISED
[9]  
Vereniging van Universiteiten (VSNU), 1999, QUAL ASS MAD MEAS PR
[10]  
ZEvA (Central Evaluation and Accreditation Agency Hanover), THESIS