FIGURAL RELATIONSHIP EFFECTS AND MECHANISMS OF VISUAL MASKING

被引:40
作者
HELLIGE, JB
WALSH, DA
LAWRENCE, VW
PRASSE, M
机构
关键词
backward vs forward visual masking &; interference of target letters; normal Ss; luminance levels; recognition; same vs different features &; stimulus onset asynchronies &;
D O I
10.1037/0096-1523.5.1.88
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In each of 3 visual pattern-masking experiments, 4 curved letters (C, O, Q, S) and 4 angular letters (E, I, L, T) served as targets preceded or followed by either a curved mask (Q, S, and C superimposed) or an angular mask (T and E superimposed). With a dark fixation and interstimulus interval field and target-mask energies that produce clearly identifiable targets, the following figural relationship effects were found. At stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) from 0 to 20 msec (in both forward and backward masking), target recognition was more accurate when targets and masks overlapped exactly (same features) than when they did not (different features). At backward masking SOAs beyond 20 msec, this pattern was reversed, but there was no such reversal in forward masking. Such results indicate that the dominant mechanism of masking at SOAs from 0 to 20 msec is luminance summation over time but that luminance summation gives way to feature-specific interference at longer SOAs. Subsequent experiments demonstrate that (a) luminance summation effects are reduced by using bright fixation and interstimulus interval fields and (b) feature-specific interference is eliminated by using low-energy (and, therefore, less than perfectly identifiable) targets and masks. (16 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved). © 1979 American Psychological Association.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 100
页数:13
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   INTEGRATION AND INTERRUPTION IN MASKING OF FORM BY FORM [J].
BACHMANN, T ;
ALLIK, J .
PERCEPTION, 1976, 5 (01) :79-97
[2]   IMPLICATIONS OF SUSTAINED AND TRANSIENT CHANNELS FOR THEORIES OF VISUAL-PATTERN MASKING, SACCADIC SUPPRESSION, AND INFORMATION-PROCESSING [J].
BREITMEYER, BG ;
GANZ, L .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1976, 83 (01) :1-36
[3]   EVIDENCE FOR AN INTEGRATION THEORY OF VISUAL MASKING [J].
COLTHEART, M ;
ARTHUR, B .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1972, 24 (AUG) :262-+
[4]   ICONIC MEMORY - REPLY TO PROFESSOR HOLDING [J].
COLTHEART, M .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1975, 3 (01) :42-48
[5]  
CORWIN TR, 1976, J EXP PSYCHOL HUMAN, V2, P162
[6]   VISUAL MASKING IN MULTIELEMENT DISPLAYS [J].
ERIKSEN, CW ;
ROHRBAUG.J .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1970, 83 (01) :147-&
[7]   UNIMPORTANCE OF FIGURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF VISUAL NOISE MASKS [J].
GUMMERMAN, K ;
HILL, GA ;
CHASTAIN, G .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 103 (04) :820-822
[8]   IMPORTANCE OF FIGURAL RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN TARGET AND MASK [J].
HELLIGE, JB ;
WALSH, DA ;
LAWRENCE, VW ;
COX, PJ .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1977, 21 (03) :285-286
[9]   METHOD FINDINGS AND THEORY IN STUDIES OF VISUAL MASKING [J].
KAHNEMAN, D .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1968, 70 (6P1) :404-&
[10]  
MASSARO DW, 1975, EXPT PSYCHOLOGY INFO