STEM-WATER POTENTIAL AS A SENSITIVE INDICATOR OF WATER-STRESS IN PRUNE TREES (PRUNUS-DOMESTICA L CV FRENCH)

被引:528
作者
MCCUTCHAN, H
SHACKEL, KA
机构
关键词
EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; LEAF-WATER POTENTIAL; SOIL WATER; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE;
D O I
10.21273/JASHS.117.4.607
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
The relative sensitivity of plant- and soil-based measures of water availability were compared for prune trees subjected to a range of irrigation regimes under field conditions. Over the growing season, leaf- and stem-water potentials (PSI) measured at midday exhibited clear differences between frequently irrigated trees and unirrigated trees that were growing on stored soil moisture. Stem-PSI was less variable than leaf-PSI, and the daily variability in stem-PSI was closely related to daily variability in evaporative demands, as measured by vapor pressure deficit (VPD). As a result of lower variability, stem-PSI reflected the small stress effect of a moderate, 50% soil moisture depletion irrigation interval, whereas leaf-PSI did not. The relation between soil water content and estimated orchard evapotranspiration (ET) was influenced by local differences in soil texture within the experimental plot. The relation between stem-PSI and ET, however, was not influenced by soil texture and, in addition, was very similar to the relation between stem-PSI and leaf stomatal conductance. Both relationships indicated that a 50% reduction in leaf and canopy level water loss characteristics was associated with relatively small reductions (0.5 to 0.6 MPa) in stem-PSI. Stem-PSI appears to be a sensitive and reliable plant-based measure of water stress in prune and may be a useful tool for experimental work and irrigation scheduling.
引用
收藏
页码:607 / 611
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   STOMATAL CLOSURE WITH SOIL-WATER DEPLETION NOT ASSOCIATED WITH CHANGES IN BULK LEAF WATER STATUS [J].
BATES, LM ;
HALL, AE .
OECOLOGIA, 1981, 50 (01) :62-65
[2]   WATER POTENTIAL GRADIENTS IN FIELD TOBACCO [J].
BEGG, JE ;
TURNER, NC .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1970, 46 (02) :343-&
[3]  
BRADFORD KJ, 1982, ENCY PLANT PHYSL B, V12, P264
[4]  
BURGER DW, 1987, HORTSCIENCE, V22, P309
[5]  
Campbell G.S., 1982, ADV IRRIG, V1, P25, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-024301-3.50008-3, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-024301-3.50008-3]
[6]  
CHALMERS DJ, 1986, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V111, P904
[7]   AVAILABILITY OF SOIL WATER TO PLANTS AS AFFECTED BY SOIL MOISTURE CONTENT AND METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS [J].
DENMEAD, OT ;
SHAW, RH .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1962, 54 (05) :385-&
[8]   TESTING WATER POTENTIAL IN PEACH-TREES AS AN INDICATOR OF WATER-STRESS [J].
GARNIER, E ;
BERGER, A .
JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1985, 60 (01) :47-56
[9]   PROCEDURE AND TEST OF AN INTERNAL DRAINAGE METHOD FOR MEASURING SOIL HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTICS IN-SITU [J].
HILLEL, D ;
STYLIANO.Y ;
KRENTOS, VD .
SOIL SCIENCE, 1972, 114 (05) :395-+
[10]  
HUNTINGTON GL, 1981, SOIL SURVEY