THE EFFECT OF NALBUPHINE AND DROPERIDOL ON SPONTANEOUS MOVEMENTS DURING INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA WITH PROPOFOL IN CHILDREN

被引:12
作者
BORGEAT, A
FUCHS, T
WILDERSMITH, O
TASSONYI, E
机构
[1] Department of Anesthesia, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva
关键词
ANESTHESIA; INDUCTION OF; ANESTHETICS; INTRAVENOUS; -; PROPOFOL; COMPLICATIONS - SPONTANEOUS MOVEMENT; DROPERIDOL; NALBUPHINE;
D O I
10.1016/0952-8180(93)90081-O
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study Objective: To investigate the effects of droperidol and nalbuphine on spontaneous movements during induction Of anesthesia with propofol in children. Design: Randomized, double-blind study. Setting: Inpatient ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgical clinic at the University Hospital of Geneva. Patients: Forty-five children, ages 4 to 12 years, undergoing routine elective ENT surgery. Interventions: Children were randomly assigned to receive either nalbuphine 0.1 mg/kg, droperidol 0.025 mg/kg, or isotonic saline 3 minutes before anesthesia induction. Induction was performed with a loading dose of propofol 3 mg/kg. Measurements and Main Results: Spontaneous movements were observed in 33%, 87%, and 100% of patients in the nalbuphine, droperidol, and control groups, respectively. The movements were dystonic and choreiform in nature and were similar in all three groups. The frequency of spontaneous movements was significantly reduced (p < 0.05) in the nalbuphine group as compared with the droperidol and control groups. Conclusions: Nalbuphine, but not droperidol, decreases the frequency of spontaneous movements induced by propofol during induction of anesthesia in children; neither quality of induction and recovery nor interval between the end of propofol administration and tracheal extubation were modified by nalbuphine as compared with the control group.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 15
页数:4
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Valanne, Korttila, Comparison of methohexitone and propofol (“Diprivan”) for induction of enflurane anaesthesia in outpatients, Postgrad Med J, 61, pp. 138-143, (1985)
[2]  
Fahy, Van Mourik, Utting, A comparison of the induction characteristics of thiopentone and propofol (2,6-diisopropyl phenol), Anaesthesia, 40, pp. 939-944, (1985)
[3]  
Stark, Binks, Dutka, O'Connor, Arnstein, Glen, A review of the safety and tolerance of propofol, Postgrad Med J, 61, pp. 152-156, (1985)
[4]  
Borgeat, Popovic, Meier, Schwander, Comparison of propofol and thiopental/halothane for short-duration ENT surgical procedures in children, Anesth Analg, 71, pp. 511-515, (1990)
[5]  
Borgeat, Dessibourg, Popovic, Meier, Blanchard, Schwander, Propofol and spontaneous movements: an EEG study, Anesthesiology, 74, pp. 24-27, (1991)
[6]  
Patel, Keeling, Newman, Radford, Induction dose of propofol in children, Anaesthesia, 43, pp. 949-952, (1988)
[7]  
Purcell-Jones, Yates, Baker, James, Comparison of the induction characteristics of thiopentone and propofol in children, Br J Anaesth, 59, pp. 1431-1436, (1987)
[8]  
Mirakhur, Induction characteristics of propofol in children: comparison with thiopentone, Anaesthesia, 43, pp. 593-598, (1988)
[9]  
Dittrichova, Brain and early behavior development in the fetus and infant, Development of Sleep in Infancy, pp. 193-204, (1969)
[10]  
Bricker, Hallucinations after propofol [Letter], Anaesthesia, 43, pp. 170-171, (1988)