THE PERFORMANCE OF A PRODUCTION-MODEL MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE

被引:30
作者
PUNT, AE
机构
关键词
MODELING; PRODUCTION DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1016/0165-7836(94)00302-D
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
The performance of a production-model management procedure (the combination of a Schaefer surplus-production function observation-error estimator and the f(0.1) harvesting strategy) is evaluated by means of Monte Carlo simulation. Several factors which impact the performance of a management procedure (initial depletion, historic catch trajectory, extent of recruitment variability, level of noise about the abundance index, and values for other population model parameters) are considered. The best performance, in terms of conservation and moving the population to its target biomass level, is achieved when recruitment variability, the noise about the abundance index and natural mortality are low, and productivity is high. Performance, in terms of conservation, is poor if management commences from a virtually unexploited state due to the possibility that the estimator overestimates the size of the biomass. In this situation, performance is improved by restricting the extent of inter-annual change in catch, although the improvement is at the expense of lesser recovery of overexploited resources and lesser utilization of resources which are initially virtually pristine. The results of this paper can be used as part of an evaluation of whether a production model can be used in the management of a particular resource.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 374
页数:26
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Andrew, Butterworth, Punt, Analysis of the Cape hake stock in Division 1.6 using an extension of the Butterworth-Andrew estimation procedure which takes biomass survey data into account, Coll. Sci. Pap. Int. Comm. SE Atl. Fish., 16, 1, pp. 15-30, (1989)
[2]  
Beddington, Cooke, The potential yield of fish stocks, Fish. Biol. Tech. Pap. 242, pp. 1-47, (1983)
[3]  
Bergh, Butterworth, Towards rational harvesting of the South African anchovy considering survey imprecision and recruitment variability, South African Journal of Marine Science, 5, pp. 937-951, (1987)
[4]  
Bergh, Johnston, A size-structured model for renewable resource management with application to resources of rock lobster in the south-east Atlantic, Benguela Trophic Functioning, 12, pp. 1005-1016, (1992)
[5]  
Butterworth, Some recommendations regarding the assessment methodologies used by ICSEAF, Coll. Sci. Pap. Int. Comm. SE Atl. Fish., 15, 1, pp. 107-155, (1988)
[6]  
Butterworth, Andrew, Dynamic catch-effort models for the hake stocks in ICSEAF Divisions 1.3 to 2.2, Coll. Sci. Pap. Int. Comm. SE Atl. Fish., 11, 1, pp. 29-58, (1984)
[7]  
Butterworth, Andrew, Further results from the application of dynamic catch-effort models to the hake stocks in the ICSEAF convention area, Coll. Sci. Pap. Int. Comm. SE Atl. Fish., 14, 1, pp. 109-160, (1987)
[8]  
Butterworth, Bergh, The development of a management procedure for the South African anchovy resource, Risk Evaluation and Biological Reference Points for Fisheries Management, 120, pp. 83-99, (1993)
[9]  
Butterworth, Punt, Bergh, Borchers, Assessment and management of South African marine resources during the period of the Benguela Ecology Programme: Key lessons and future directions, Benguela Trophic Functioning, 12, pp. 989-1004, (1992)
[10]  
Cooke, On the relationship between catch per unit effort and whale abundance, Rep. Int. Whaling Commission, 35, pp. 511-519, (1985)