POLYURETHANE FILM (OPSITE) VS IMPREGNATED GAUZE (JELONET) IN THE TREATMENT OF OUTPATIENT BURNS - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED STUDY

被引:21
作者
POULSEN, TD [1 ]
FREUND, KG [1 ]
ARENDRUP, K [1 ]
NYHUUS, P [1 ]
PEDERSEN, OD [1 ]
机构
[1] ESBJERG CENT HOSP,DEPT ORTHOPED SURG,ESBJERG,DENMARK
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0305-4179(91)90014-8
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
As it has been shown that re-epithelialization of partial skin thickness wounds can be accelerated if the wound is kept moist, a prospective, randomized clinical study compared the water vapour-semipermeable polyurethane film, Opsite, with the conventional impregnated gauze dressing, Jelonet, in the treatment of outpatient partial skin thickness burns. Fifty-five patients were included: 30 were treated with polyurethane film and 25 with the conventional dressing. The patients were followed at regular intervals until healing had occurred and were seen 3 months later for evaluation of residual scars and pigmentation. The burns treated with polyurethane films healed with a median of 10 days, while the conventionally treated burns healed with a median of 7 days (P > 0.05). Residual scars were noted in 21 per cent of the patients treated with polyurethane films and in 8 per cent treated conventionally (P > 0.05). Prophylactic methods should be publicly stressed since one-quarter of the patients were children of 3 years or less who were scalded by spilt hot liquids. Furthermore the patients' wounds were only briefly cooled before attending medical care. With small burns we advise that cooling should be prolonged until the pain fades then professional assistance should be sought.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 61
页数:3
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Bache, Clinical evaluation of the use of Op-Site gloves for the treatment of partial thickness bums of the hand, Burns, 14, (1988)
[2]  
Buchan, Andrews, Lang, Et al., Clinical and laboratory investigation of the composition and properties of human skin wound exudate under semipermeable dressings, Burns, 7, (1981)
[3]  
Hinman, Effect of air exposure and occlusion on experimental human skin wounds, Nature, 200, (1962)
[4]  
James, Watson, The use of OpSite, a vapour permeable dressing, on skin graft donor sites, Br. J. Plast. Surg., 28, (1975)
[5]  
Jonkman, Molenaar, Nieuwenhuis, Et al., Evaporative water loss and epidermis regeneration in partial-thickness wounds dressed with a fluid-retaining versus a clot-inducing wound covering in guinea pigs, Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 23, (1989)
[6]  
Lamke, Nilsson, Reithner, The evaporative water loss from bums and the water-vapour permeability of grafts and artificial membranes used in the treatment of bums, Burns, 3, (1977)
[7]  
Neal, Whaley, Flowers, Et al., The effects of an adherent polyurethane film and conventional absorbent dressings in patients with small partial thickness bums, Br. J. Clin. Pract., 35, (1981)
[8]  
Queen, Evans, Gaylor, Et al., Bum wound dressings, Burns, 13, (1987)
[9]  
Sorensen, First aid in bum injuries: treatment at home with cold water, Mod. Treatment, 4, (1967)
[10]  
Winter, Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelialization of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig, Nature, 193, (1962)