PRECONDITIONING EXPOSURE TO THE UNCONDITIONED STIMULUS AFFECTS THE ACQUISITION OF A CONDITIONED EMOTIONAL RESPONSE

被引:51
作者
RANDICH, A [1 ]
LOLORDO, VM [1 ]
机构
[1] DALHOUSIE UNIV,HALIFAX,NS,CANADA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0023-9690(79)90033-X
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Four experiments examined the UCS preexposure phenomenon using conditioned suppression of food-reinforced responding as a measure of excitatory conditioning, and electric shock as a UCS. In Experiment 1, groups of rats were preexposed to unsignaled 0.8-mA electric shocks for 0, 1, 3, 5, or 10 days, and then conditioned with a 0.8-mA electric shock. Preexposure to electric shock 1 day prior to conditioning enhanced the acquisition of a CER, whereas preexposure to electric shock for 3, 5, or 10 days prior to conditioning attenuated the acquisition of a CER as a direct function of the number of days of preexposure. In Experiments 2 and 2A, groups of rats were preexposed to unsignaled electric shocks of 0.3, 0.5, 0.8, or 1.3 mA for 10 days, and then conditioned with a 0.8-mA electric shocl. All groups preexposed to electric shock acquired the CER at a slower rate than a group not preexposed to electric shock. The greatest attenuation of CER conditioning occurred when the same intensity electric shock was used during both the preexposure and conditioning phases. In Experiment 3, groups of rats were preexposed to signaled electric shocks of either 0.5, 0.8, or 1.3 mA, and then conditioned with a 0.8-mA electric shock. All groups preexposed to electric shock acquired the CER at a slower rate than a group not preexposed to electric shock. As in Experiments 2 and 2A, the greatest attenuation of CER conditioning occurred when the same intensity electric shock was used during both the preexposure and conditioning phases. In Experiment 4, groups of rats were preexposed to series of 0.5, 0.8, or 1.3-mA electric shocks which they could escape by performing a chain-pull response. Rats in each of these groups had yoked partners which received the same number, intensity, and temporal pattern of electric shocks, but could not perform a response to escape shock. All groups were then conditioned with a 0.8-mA electric shock. Rats preexposed to escapable electric shocks showed equal or greater attenuation of CER conditioning than rats which could not escape shock during the preexposure phase. These results are discussed in terms of nonassociative and associative explanations of the UCS preexposure phenomenon. © 1979.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 277
页数:33
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   ESCAPE PERFORMANCE FOLLOWING EXPOSURE TO INESCAPABLE SHOCK - DEFICITS IN MOTOR RESPONSE MAINTENANCE [J].
ANISMAN, H ;
DECATANZARO, D ;
REMINGTON, G .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIOR PROCESSES, 1978, 4 (03) :197-218
[2]  
ANISMAN H, 1975, PSYCHOL REV, V82, P359
[3]   TIME-DEPENDENT CHANGES IN ACTIVITY, REACTIVITY, AND RESPONSIVITY DURING SHOCK - EFFECTS OF CHOLINERGIC AND CATECHOLAMINERGIC MANIPULATIONS [J].
ANISMAN, H .
BEHAVIORAL BIOLOGY, 1977, 21 (01) :1-31
[4]   CONDITIONED EMOTIONAL RESPONSE AS A FUNCTION OF INTENSITY OF US [J].
ANNAU, Z ;
KAMIN, LJ .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1961, 54 (04) :428-&
[5]   PREEXPOSURE TO THE CS ALONE, US ALONE, OR CS AND US UNCORRELATED - LATENT INHIBITION, BLOCKING BY CONTEXT OR LEARNED IRRELEVANCE [J].
BAKER, AG ;
MACKINTOSH, NJ .
LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 1979, 10 (03) :278-294
[7]   FORMATION OF TASTE AVERSIONS IN RATS FOLLOWING PRIOR EXPOSURE TO SICKNESS [J].
BRAVEMAN, NS .
LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 1975, 6 (04) :512-534
[8]  
Brush FR, 1971, AVERSIVE CONDITION, P401
[9]   EFFECT OF PRECONDITIONING UNCONDITIONED STIMULUS EXPERIENCE ON LEARNED TASTE AVERSIONS [J].
CANNON, DS ;
BERMAN, RF ;
BAKER, TB ;
ATKINSON, CA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIOR PROCESSES, 1975, 1 (03) :270-284
[10]   CONDITIONED AVERSION BY AMPHETAMINE - RATES OF ACQUISITION AND LOSS OF ATTENUATING EFFECTS OF PRIOR EXPOSURE [J].
CAPPELL, H ;
LEBLANC, AE .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGIA, 1975, 43 (02) :157-162