UNUSUAL LOCATIONS OF EARTHS BOW SHOCK ON SEPTEMBER 24-25, 1987 - MACH NUMBER EFFECTS

被引:67
作者
CAIRNS, IH
FAIRFIELD, DH
ANDERSON, RR
CARLTON, VEH
PAULARENA, KI
LAZARUS, AJ
机构
[1] UNIV IOWA, DEPT PHYS & ASTRON, VAN ALLEN HALL, IOWA CITY, IA 52242 USA
[2] MIT, CTR SPACE RES, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02139 USA
[3] NASA, GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CTR, EXTRATERR PHYS LAB, GREENBELT, MD 20771 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/94JA01978
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
ISEE 1 and IMP 8 data are used to identify 19 crossings of Earth's bow shock during a 30-hour period following 0000 UT on September 24, 1987. Apparent standoff distances for the shock are calculated for each crossing using two methods and the spacecraft location; one method assumes the average shock shape, while the other assumes a ram pressure-dependent shock shape. The shock's apparent standoff distance, normally similar to 14 R(E), is shown to increase from near 10 R(E) initially to near 19 R(E) during an 8-hour period, followed by an excursion to near 35 R(E) (where two IMP 8 shock crossings occur) and an eventual return to values smaller than 19 R(E). The Alfven M(A) and fast magnetosonic M(ms) Mach numbers remain above 2 and the humber density above 4 cm(-3) for almost the entire period. Ram pressure effects produce the initial near-Earth shock location, whereas expansions and contractions of the bow shock due to low Mach number effects account, qualitatively and semiquantitatively, for the timing and existence of almost all the remaining ISEE crossings and both IMP 8 crossings. Significant quantitative differences exist between the apparent standoff distances for the shock crossings and those predicted using the observed plasma parameters and the standard model based on Spreiter et al.'s (1966) gasdynamic equation. These differences can be explained in terms of either a different dependence of the standoff distance on Mach number at low M(A) and M(ms), or variations in shock shape with M(A) and M(ms) (becoming increasingly ''puffed up'' with decreasing M(A) and M(ms), as expected theoretically), or by a combination of both effects. Global MHD simulations, to be presented elsewhere, confirm that both effects occur and are significant. Ram pressure-induced changes in the shock's shape are discussed but found to be quantitatively unimportant for the shock crossings analyzed. Approximate estimates of both the deviation of the shock's standoff distance from the standard model and of the shock's shape are determined independently (but not consistently) for M(ms)similar to 2.4. The estimates imply substantial changes in standoff distance and/or shock shape at low M(A) and M(ms). Mach number effects can therefore be quantitatively important in determining and predicting the shape and location of the bow shock, even when M(A) and M(ms) remain above 2. This study confirms and generalizes previous studies of Mach number effects on Earth's bow shock. Statistical studies and simulations of the bow shock's shape and location should be performed as a function of Mach number, magnetic field orientation, and ram pressure.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 62
页数:16
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   PLASMA-WAVES ASSOCIATED WITH ENERGETIC PARTICLES STREAMING INTO THE SOLAR-WIND FROM THE EARTHS BOW SHOCK [J].
ANDERSON, RR ;
PARKS, GK ;
EASTMAN, TE ;
GURNETT, DA ;
FRANK, LA .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1981, 86 (NA6) :4493-4510
[2]   INWARD MOTION OF MAGNETOPAUSE BEFORE A SUBSTORM [J].
AUBRY, MP ;
RUSSELL, CT ;
KIVELSON, MG .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1970, 75 (34) :7018-+
[3]   SIMULTANEOUS IMP 2 AND OGO 1 OBSERVATIONS OF BOW SHOCK COMPRESSION [J].
BINSACK, JH ;
VASYLIUNAS, VM .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1968, 73 (01) :429-+
[4]   REMOTE-SENSING OF NEPTUNE BOW SHOCK - EVIDENCE FOR LARGE-SCALE SHOCK MOTIONS [J].
CAIRNS, IH ;
SMITH, CW ;
KURTH, WS ;
GURNETT, DA ;
MOSES, S .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-PLANETS, 1991, 96 :19153-19169
[5]  
ELPHIC RC, 1988, ADV SPACE RES, V8, P223
[6]   DETAILED STUDY OF ELECTRON-PLASMA WAVES UPSTREAM OF THE EARTHS BOW SHOCK [J].
ETCHETO, J ;
FAUCHEUX, M .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1984, 89 (NA8) :6631-6653
[7]   AVERAGE AND UNUSUAL LOCATIONS OF EARTHS MAGNETOPAUSE AND BOW SHOCK [J].
FAIRFIELD, DH .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1971, 76 (28) :6700-+
[8]   STANDING WAVES AT LOW MACH NUMBER LAMINAR BOW SHOCKS [J].
FAIRFIELD, DH ;
FELDMAN, WC .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1975, 80 (04) :515-522
[9]   THE THICKNESS OF THE MAGNETOSHEATH - CONSTRAINTS ON THE POLYTROPIC INDEX [J].
FARRIS, MH ;
PETRINEC, SM ;
RUSSELL, CT .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1991, 18 (10) :1821-1824
[10]   ELECTROSTATIC NOISE AT THE PLASMA FREQUENCY BEYOND THE EARTHS BOW SHOCK [J].
FILBERT, PC ;
KELLOGG, PJ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1979, 84 (NA4) :1369-1381