ROBINSON ANTERIOR CERVICAL FUSION - COMPARISON OF THE STANDARD AND MODIFIED TECHNIQUES

被引:129
作者
EMERY, SE
BOLESTA, MJ
BANKS, MA
JONES, PK
机构
[1] CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIV,DEPT ORTHOPAED SURG,CLEVELAND,OH 44106
[2] CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIV,DEPT BIOSTAT & EPIDEMIOL,CLEVELAND,OH 44106
[3] COLUMBIA ORTHOPAED GRP,COLUMBIA,MO
关键词
ANTERIOR CERVICAL FUSION; INTERBODY ARTHRODESIS; PSEUDOARTHROSIS RATE;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199403001-00004
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
In 1990 the authors modified the Robinson anterior cervical interbody fusion technique by burring the end-plates to expose subchondral bone. The authors compared 31 patients having the standard technique and 29 patients having the modified technique to evaluate 1) settling of the bone graft, 2) kyphotic angulation, 3) pseudarthrosis rate, and 4) pain outcome. In the standard Robinson fusion technique, the average loss of height across the fused segments was 0.8 mm and the average increase in kyphosis 4.9-degrees. Values for the modified technique were 1.9 mm and 3.1-degrees, respectively. The change in height was statistically significant (P = .01), as was the difference in angulation (P = .028), though the latter was in the opposite direction predicted. The pseudarthrosis rate using the modified technique decreased to 4.4% per level. Pain outcome for the two groups was equivalent. Burring of the endplates for anterior cervical interbody arthrodesis results in a detectable but not clinically important amount of graft settling with a higher success rate for arthrodesis.
引用
收藏
页码:660 / 663
页数:4
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
Bohlman H.H., Cervical spondylosis with moderate to severe myelopathy: A report of 17 cases treated by Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, Spine, 2, (1977)
[2]  
Depalma A.F., Rothman R.H., Lewinnek G.E., Canale S.T., Anterior interbody fusion for severe cervical disc degeneration, Surg Gynecol Obstet, 134, pp. 755-758, (1972)
[3]  
Emery S.E., Bohlman H.H., Goodfellow D.B., Robinson an-terior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical radiculopathy: Long-term follow-up of 122 patients, Orthop Trans, 15, (1991)
[4]  
Gore D.R., Sepic S.B., Anterior cervical fusion for degener-ated or protruded discs: A review of 146 patients, Spine, 9, pp. 667-671, (1984)
[5]  
Morrissy R.T., Goldsmith G.S., Hall E.C., Kehl D., Cowie G.H., Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis, J Bone Joint Surg, 72A, (1990)
[6]  
Robinson R.A., Smith G.W., Anterolateral cervical disc re-moval and interbody fusion for cervical disc syndrome, Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp, 96, pp. 223-224, (1955)
[7]  
Robinson R.A., Walker A.E., Ferlick D.C., Wiecking D.K., The results of anterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine, J Bone Joint Surg, 44A, pp. 1569-1587, (1962)
[8]  
White A.A., Southwick W.O., Deponte R.J., Gainor J.W., Hardy R., Relief of pain by anterior cervical spine fusion for spondylosis, J Bone Joint Surg, 55A, pp. 525-534, (1973)
[9]  
Williams J.L., Allen M.B., Harkess J.W., Late results of cervical discectomy and interbody fusion: Some factors influ-encing the results, J Bone Joint Surg, 50A, pp. 277-286, (1968)