ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS - IS THERE A DIFFERENCE

被引:51
作者
FARO, S
MARTENS, MG
HAMMILL, HA
RIDDLE, G
TORTOLERO, G
机构
[1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Section of Infectious Diseases, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
关键词
ampicillin; Antibiotic prophylaxis; cefazolin; cefotetan; enterococci; piperacillin;
D O I
10.1016/0002-9378(90)91290-S
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Seven antibiotics, administered in 10 different regimens for prophylaxis, were randomly assigned to 1580 patients who were delivered by cesarean section. Cefazolin 1 gm, administered for three doses, served as the control group. Cefazolin 1 gm, cefazolin 2 gm, cefoxitin 1 gm, cefoxitin 2 gm, cefonicid 1 gm, cefotetan 1 gm, ceftizoxime 1 gm, ampicillin 2 gm, and piperacillin 4 gm were all administered in a single dose. Four antibiotics proved to be superior in preventing postpartum endometritis: ampicillin 2 gm (p = 0.03), cefazolin 2 gm (p = 0.005), piperacillin 4 gm (p = 0.0007), and cefotetan 1 gm (p = 0.0001). Single-dose cephalosporin antibiotic prophylaxis was found to result in approximately a twofold increase in Enterococcus faecalis colonization of the vagina (p < 0.01). This may be significant in patients in whom postpartum endometritis develops and who have failure of initial treatment with a broad-spectrum cephalosporin, e.g., cefoxitin or cefotetan, or a combination such as clindamycin or metronidazole plus an aminoglycoside. Rupture of amniotic membranes for a half hour or more was associated with an increased risk for postpartum endometritis. The use of internal fetal monitoring was associated with an increased risk of soft tissue pelvic infection. © 1990.
引用
收藏
页码:900 / 909
页数:10
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] INFECTIOUS MORBIDITY AFTER PRIMARY CESAREAN SECTIONS IN A PRIVATE INSTITUTION
    ANSTEY, JT
    SHELDON, GW
    BLYTHE, JG
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1980, 136 (02) : 205 - 210
  • [2] BENIGNO BB, 1986, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V162, P1
  • [3] CUNNINGHAM FG, 1978, OBSTET GYNECOL, V52, P656
  • [4] EMMONS SL, 1988, OBSTET GYNECOL, V72, P559
  • [5] FARO S, 1987, CURR THER RES CLIN E, V42, P995
  • [6] FARO S, 1987, OBSTET GYNECOL, V69, P760
  • [7] FARO S, 1989, OBSTET GYNECOL, V73, P808
  • [8] PERSPECTIVES ON THE BACTERIOLOGY OF POSTOPERATIVE OBSTETRIC-GYNECOLOGIC INFECTIONS
    FARO, S
    PHILLIPS, LE
    MARTENS, MG
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1988, 158 (03) : 694 - 700
  • [9] FARO S, 1986, OBSTET GYNECOL, V6, P51
  • [10] LITTLEJOHN T W JR, 1985, Advances in Therapy, V2, P240