IMPLICATIONS OF SEEMINGLY IRRELEVANT EVIDENCE IN AUDIT JUDGMENT

被引:88
作者
HACKENBRACK, K
机构
关键词
D O I
10.2307/2491095
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 136
页数:11
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   DIMENSIONS OF CONSUMER EXPERTISE [J].
ALBA, JW ;
HUTCHINSON, JW .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1987, 13 (04) :411-454
[2]  
ASHTON R, 1982, HUMAN INFORMATION PR
[3]  
COHEN J, 1989, J ACCOUNTING RES AUT, P263
[4]  
FREDERICK DM, 1986, J ACCOUNTING RES AUT, P270
[5]  
GIBBINS M, 1984, 1984 AUD RES S, P181
[6]  
LIBBY R, 1989, STATE ACCOUNTING RES, P126
[7]  
LIBBY R, 1981, ACCOUNTING INFORMATI
[8]   THE DILUTION EFFECT - NON-DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION WEAKENS THE IMPLICATIONS OF DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION [J].
NISBETT, RE ;
ZUKIER, H ;
LEMLEY, RE .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 13 (02) :248-277
[9]   ACCOUNTABILITY - A SOCIAL MAGNIFIER OF THE DILUTION EFFECT [J].
TETLOCK, PE ;
BOETTGER, R .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 57 (03) :388-398
[10]  
TVERSKY A, 1977, PSYCHOL REV, V84, P327, DOI 10.1037/h0026750