OSTEOSARCOMA AFTER CHEMOTHERAPY - EVALUATION WITH CONTRAST MATERIAL ENHANCED SUBTRACTION MR IMAGING

被引:74
作者
DEBAERE, T
VANEL, D
SHAPEERO, LG
CHARPENTIER, A
TERRIER, P
DIPAOLA, M
机构
[1] INST GUSTAVE ROUSSY,DEPT RADIOL,F-94805 VILLEJUIF,FRANCE
[2] INST GUSTAVE ROUSSY,DEPT PATHOL,F-94805 VILLEJUIF,FRANCE
[3] INST GUSTAVE ROUSSY,DEPT BIOMED IMAGING,F-94805 VILLEJUIF,FRANCE
关键词
BONE NEOPLASMS; MR; THERAPY; CHEMOTHERAPY; EXTREMITIES; NEOPLASMS; OSTEOSARCOMA;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.185.2.1410378
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A new magnetic resonance (MR) technique, gadolinium-enhanced subtraction MR imaging, was developed to evaluate the response of patients with osteosarcoma to chemotherapy. Ten patients, who had received chemotherapy for osteosarcoma of the lower extremity, underwent MR imaging 3 days before surgery. After routine MR imaging was performed, subtraction MR was performed in the plane in which the tumor was best visualized. With gadopentetate dimeglumine (0.1 mmol per kilogram) on a standard MR console, subtraction images were created by subtracting precontrast images from gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images. The time of maximal tumoral vascular uptake was 1 1/2 minutes after injection, and, therefore, the subtracted image obtained at this time was used for evaluation of viable tumor. Independently, radiologists and histopathologists examined their respective studies for viable tumor to differentiate responders from nonresponders. Four of 10 osteosarcomas were classified as good responders because they appeared as nonenhancing masses, with or without enhancing thin lines, or small nodules (less-than-or-equal-to 3 mm wide). At histopathologic examination, all were good responders with less than 3% viable tumor. Six of 10 osteosarcomas were classified as nonresponders because they appeared as enhancing high-signal-intensity masses measuring more than 3 mm in width. Five tumors had between 18% and 43% viable tumor cells.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 592
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] BONNEROT V, IN PRESS INVEST RADI
  • [2] OSTEO-SARCOMA - ANGIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF RESPONSE TO PREOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY
    CARRASCO, CH
    CHARNSANGAVEJ, C
    RAYMOND, AK
    RICHLI, WR
    WALLACE, S
    CHAWLA, SP
    AYALA, AG
    MURRAY, JA
    BENJAMIN, RS
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1989, 170 (03) : 839 - 842
  • [3] HANDLING OF DYNAMIC SEQUENCES IN NUCLEAR-MEDICINE
    DIPAOLA, R
    BAZIN, JP
    AUBRY, F
    AURENGO, A
    CAVAILLOLES, F
    HERRY, JY
    KAHN, E
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 1982, 29 (04) : 1310 - 1321
  • [4] MUSCULOSKELETAL NEOPLASMS - STATIC AND DYNAMIC GD-DTPA ENHANCED MR IMAGING
    ERLEMANN, R
    REISER, MF
    PETERS, PE
    VASALLO, P
    NOMMENSEN, B
    KUSNIERZGLAZ, CR
    RITTER, J
    ROESSNER, A
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1989, 171 (03) : 767 - 773
  • [5] RADIATION FIBROSIS - DIFFERENTIATION FROM RECURRENT TUMOR BY MR IMAGING - WORK IN PROGRESS
    GLAZER, HS
    LEE, JKT
    LEVITT, RG
    HEIKEN, JP
    LING, D
    TOTTY, WG
    BALFE, DM
    EMANI, B
    WASSERMAN, TH
    MURPHY, WA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1985, 156 (03) : 721 - 726
  • [6] HANNA LH, 1991, AJR, V157, P861
  • [7] SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE FOR CONTRAST-ENHANCED MR IMAGES OF MUSCULOSKELETAL TUMORS
    HANNA, SL
    LANGSTON, JW
    GRONEMEYER, SA
    FLETCHER, BD
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1990, 8 (03) : 213 - 215
  • [8] OSTEOSARCOMA - CHEMOTHERAPY-INDUCED CHANGES AT MR IMAGING
    HOLSCHER, HC
    BLOEM, JL
    VANEL, D
    HERMANS, J
    NOOY, MA
    TAMINIAU, AHM
    HENRYAMAR, M
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1992, 182 (03) : 839 - 844
  • [9] HUVOS AG, 1977, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V101, P14
  • [10] SCINTIGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF TUMOR-REGRESSION DURING PREOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY OF OSTEOSARCOMA - CORRELATION OF TC-99M-METHYLENE DIPHOSPHONATE PARAMETRIC IMAGING WITH SURGICAL HISTOPATHOLOGY
    KNOP, J
    DELLING, G
    HEISE, U
    WINKLER, K
    [J]. SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 1990, 19 (03) : 165 - 172