RANDOMIZED COMPARISON TRIAL OF TEICOPLANIN-IV, TEICOPLANIN-IM, AND CEFAZOLIN THERAPY FOR SKIN AND SOFT-TISSUE INFECTIONS CAUSED BY GRAM-POSITIVE BACTERIA

被引:12
作者
CHIRURGI, VA
EDELSTEIN, H
OSTER, SE
KARP, R
CASSANO, KB
AIKEN, S
MCCABE, RE
机构
[1] HIGHLAND GEN HOSP,OAKLAND,CA
[2] UNIV CALIF DAVIS,SCH MED,DEPT MED,DAVIS,CA 95616
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00007611-199409000-00002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Teicoplanin, a glycopeptide antibiotic chemically related to the vancomycin-ristocetin group of antibiotics, has potent activity against aerobic and anaerobic gram-positive bacteria. In this study, we examined the efficacy and safety of teicoplanin for parenteral treatment of skin and soft tissue infections caused by gram-positive bacteria. Ninety-six hospitalized adults with moderate to severe skin and soft tissue infections were randomized to receive either teicoplanin intravenously (IV) once a day, teicoplanin intramuscularly (IM) once a day, or cefazolin IV every 8 hours. We evaluated patients' clinical and microbiologic status and assessed clinical and laboratory adverse events. Of 76 clinically assessable patients, 26 of 26 (100%) given teicoplanin IV, 21 of 22 (95%) given teicoplanin IM, and 26 of 28 (93%) given cefazolin showed improvement or cure. Of 60 microbiologically assessable patients, 22 of 22 (100%) given teicoplanin IV, 16 of 18 (89%) given teicoplanin IM, and 18 of 20 (90%) given cefazolin were cured. Of 96 patients assessable for adverse events, 7 of 34: (21%) given teicoplanin IV, 4 of 31 (13%) given teicoplanin IM, and 1 of 31 (3%) given cefazolin had adverse events. In this study, once daily teicoplanin appeared to be safe and effective therapy for skin and soft tissue infections.
引用
收藏
页码:875 / 880
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF EFFICACY, PHARMACOKINETICS, AND SAFETY OF TEICOPLANIN FOR SERIOUS GRAM-POSITIVE INFECTIONS [J].
BIBLER, MR ;
FRAME, PT ;
HAGLER, DN ;
BODE, RB ;
STANECK, JL ;
THAMLIKITKUL, V ;
HARRIS, JE ;
HAREGEWOIN, A ;
BULLOCK, WE .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1987, 31 (02) :207-212
[2]   ABSENCE OF OTOTOXICITY OF TEICHOMYCIN A2 IN GUINEA-PIGS [J].
BRUMMETT, RE ;
FOX, KE ;
WARCHOL, M ;
HIMES, D .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1987, 31 (04) :612-613
[3]   INTRAVENOUS OR INTRAMUSCULAR TEICOPLANIN ONCE DAILY FOR SKIN AND SOFT-TISSUE INFECTIONS [J].
EDELSTEIN, HE ;
OSTER, SE ;
CHIRURGI, VA ;
KARP, RA ;
CASSANO, KB ;
MCCABE, RE .
DICP-THE ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1991, 25 (09) :914-918
[4]  
GOLDSTEIN NH, 1984, CURR THER RES CLIN E, V36, P653
[5]   DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF TEICOPLANIN VERSUS VANCOMYCIN IN FEBRILE NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS RECEIVING CONCOMITANT TOBRAMYCIN AND PIPERACILLIN - EFFECT ON CYCLOSPORINE-A-ASSOCIATED NEPHROTOXICITY [J].
KUREISHI, A ;
JEWESSON, PJ ;
RUBINGER, M ;
COLE, CD ;
REECE, DE ;
PHILLIPS, GL ;
SMITH, JA ;
CHOW, AW .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1991, 35 (11) :2246-2252
[6]   A MULTICENTER OPEN CLINICAL-TRIAL OF TEICOPLANIN IN INFECTIONS CAUSED BY GRAM-POSITIVE BACTERIA [J].
LEWIS, P ;
GARAUD, JJ ;
PARENTI, F .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1988, 21 :61-67
[7]   INVITRO ACTIVITY OF TEICHOMYCIN COMPARED WITH THOSE OF OTHER ANTIBIOTICS [J].
NEU, HC ;
LABTHAVIKUL, P .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1983, 24 (03) :425-428
[8]   TEICOPLANIN PHARMACOKINETICS IN HEALTHY-VOLUNTEERS AFTER ADMINISTRATION OF INTRAVENOUS LOADING AND MAINTENANCE DOSES [J].
OUTMAN, WR ;
NIGHTINGALE, CH ;
SWEENEY, KR ;
QUINTILIANI, R .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1990, 34 (11) :2114-2117
[9]   COMPARISON OF VANCOMYCIN-INDUCED AND TEICOPLANIN-INDUCED HISTAMINE-RELEASE AND RED MAN SYNDROME [J].
SAHAI, J ;
HEALY, DP ;
SHELTON, MJ ;
MILLER, JS ;
RUBERG, SJ ;
POLK, R .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1990, 34 (05) :765-769
[10]  
SLUTKIN G, 1984, REV INFECT DIS, V6, pS853