CHEWING PRESSURE VS WEAR OF COMPOSITES AND OPPOSING ENAMEL CUSPS

被引:50
作者
LUTZ, F
KREJCI, I
BARBAKOW, F
机构
[1] Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, Dental Institute, Z¼rich University, CH-8032 Zurich
关键词
D O I
10.1177/00220345920710081201
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The effects of various chewing pressures on the wear of composites and enamel were assessed in vitro. Standardized composite discs (8 mm in diameter, 2 mm in height) were made of a fine-particle hybrid (FPH), a coarse-particle hybrid (CPH), and a homogeneous microfilled composite (HMC). The composite specimens were chemically degraded by immersion in 75% ethanol for 24 h, brushed for 30 min, and then thermocycled 300 times (5-55-5-degrees-C) while being occlusally loaded 120,000 times at 1.7 Hz, with chewing forces of 25,50,75,and 100 N. Standardized human enamel cusps with a uniform contact area of 0.384 mm2 served as antagonists in the chewing machine. Wear of the composites and enamel cusps, their combined wear, and the increase of the enamel contact surfaces were quantified. An increase in chewing pressure significantly enhanced the wear of both composite and enamel in all groups except for the antagonists opposing a HMC. The FPH was most wear-resistant to in vitro chewing pressures in the range of 6.58 to 19.74 MN/m2, the CPH at 26.32 MN/m2, while the HMC was the most enamel-friendly of the three composites tested. The FPH composite had the least disintegration in the occlusal contact area. The ranking of the composites generally varied at the different chewing pressures with respect to the three types of quantified wear-that is, composite wear, enamel wear, and total wear.
引用
收藏
页码:1525 / 1529
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   INFLUENCE OF CONTACT STRESS, SLIDING VELOCITY, AND SURFACE-ROUGHNESS ON THE SLIDING WEAR OF A COMPOSITE RESTORATIVE [J].
BAILEY, WF ;
RICE, SL ;
ALBERT, RJ ;
TEMIN, SC .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1981, 60 (05) :914-918
[2]   COMPARATIVE SLIDING-WEAR BEHAVIOR OF A DENTAL AMALGAM AND A COMPOSITE RESTORATIVE AS A FUNCTION OF CONTACT STRESS [J].
BAILEY, WF ;
RICE, SL .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1981, 60 (03) :731-732
[3]   INVIVO EVALUATION OF 4 POSTERIOR COMPOSITES - QUANTITATIVE WEAR MEASUREMENTS AND CLINICAL BEHAVIOR [J].
BRAEM, M ;
LAMBRECHTS, P ;
VANDOREN, V ;
VANHERLE, G .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1986, 2 (03) :106-113
[4]   EXCESSIVE WEAR OF NATURAL TOOTH STRUCTURE BY OPPOSING COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS [J].
CHAPMAN, RJ ;
NATHANSON, D .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1983, 106 (01) :51-53
[5]  
CRAIG RG, 1976, INT DENT J, V26, P121
[6]   EFFECT OF ABRASION MEDIUM ON WEAR OF STRESS-BEARING COMPOSITES AND AMALGAM INVITRO [J].
DEGEE, AJ ;
PALLAV, P ;
DAVIDSON, CL .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1986, 65 (05) :654-658
[7]   DEVELOPMENT OF AN ARTIFICIAL ORAL ENVIRONMENT FOR THE TESTING OF DENTAL RESTORATIVES - BI-AXIAL FORCE AND MOVEMENT CONTROL [J].
DELONG, R ;
DOUGLAS, WH .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1983, 62 (01) :32-36
[8]  
GRABER G, 1980, QUINTESSENZ EINER PR
[9]  
Harrison A, 1985, DENT MATER, V1, P15
[10]  
Krejci I, 1990, Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed, V100, P1445