ORGANIC-CARBON EFFECTS ON AVAILABLE WATER CAPACITY OF 3 SOIL TEXTURAL GROUPS

被引:114
作者
BAUER, A
BLACK, AL
机构
[1] USDA, Mandan, United States
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600010038x
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
A major cause of soil productivity loss through erosion is attributed to changes in soil water-holding properties or a reduction in thickness of the plant rooting zone. The objective of this study was to measure the effect of management-induced changes in soil organic carbon (OC) concentration on soil characteristics affecting the available water capacity. Four sites each of moderately coarse (sandy), medium, and moderately fine or fine (fine) soils were sampled in four increments to 0.457 m within each of two cropland management systems (conventionally cultivated and stubble mulched) and each of two virgin grassland management systems (grazed virgin and relict virgin). Measurements of the water concentration by weight (P(w)) at field capacity (FC) and permanent wilting point (PWP) were made on disturbed soil samples. Bulk density decreased with increasing OC concentration. The magnitude of change was greatest in sandy and least in the medium-textured soils. For all soils combined, a change in sand fraction accounted for about 75% of the change in P(w) at both the FC and the PWP. The change in P(w) was greater at FC than the PWP. A unit change in OC concentration in the sandy soils caused a greater change in P(w) at FC than at the PWP, but in the medium and fine soils the change in P(w) at FC essentially paralleled the change at the PWP. An increase in OC concentration did not change the available water capacity in the sandy group and decreased it in the medium and fine textural groups. Loss of soil productivity induced by erosion in the northern Great Plains is probably more closely associated with a decline in nutrients and biological activity than from a change in available water capacity.
引用
收藏
页码:248 / 254
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
ALTER PJ, 1961, J SOIL SCI, V12, P335
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1947, AGR ENG
[3]  
BARR AJ, 1976, USERS GUIDE SAS
[4]   SOIL CARBON, NITROGEN, AND BULK-DENSITY COMPARISONS IN 2 CROPLAND TILLAGE SYSTEMS AFTER 25 YEARS AND IN VIRGIN GRASSLAND [J].
BAUER, A ;
BLACK, AL .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1981, 45 (06) :1166-1170
[5]   SOIL PROPERTY COMPARISONS IN VIRGIN GRASSLANDS BETWEEN GRAZED AND NONGRAZED MANAGEMENT-SYSTEMS [J].
BAUER, A ;
COLE, CV ;
BLACK, AL .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1987, 51 (01) :176-182
[6]  
Buoyoucos GJ, 1962, AGRON J, V54, P464
[7]  
Cassel DK, 1974, N DAKOTA AGR EXP STN, V495
[8]  
CASSEL DK, 1986, AGRONOMY, V9, P901
[9]  
Day P., 1965, METHODS SOIL ANAL 1, P545, DOI DOI 10.2134/AGRONMONOGR9.1.C43
[10]  
EDLAND L, 1988, SOIL SURVEY GRANT CO