PRELIMINARY-RESULTS OF AN EVALUATION OF 3 HEALTHY CITIES INITIATIVES IN THE MONTREAL AREA

被引:13
作者
OUELLET, F
DURAND, D
FORGET, G
机构
[1] LAKESHORE HOSP, DEPT COMMUNITY HLTH, POINTE CLAIRE, PQ, CANADA
[2] HOP MAISON NEUVE ROSEMONT, DEPT COMMUNITY HLTH, MONTREAL H1T 2M4, QUEBEC, CANADA
关键词
EVALUATION; RESEARCH; HEALTHY CITIES;
D O I
10.1093/heapro/9.3.153
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
In September 1991, we began to evaluate three Healthy Cities initiatives in the Montreal area using a holistic approach, based on the theory of negotiated mode of action. We are experimenting with an interactive evaluation method which aims to involve participants in the process and to help them gain a better understanding of their project. Two techniques are being used to concretize the process: a steering committee who interpret the data collected throughout the process and a newsletter that outlines the results to participants at all sites. This paper describes how three elements of the Healthy Cities concept-sharing of common objectives, intersectoral action and citizen participation-are being implemented at the three sites being analyzed. We will show that the three initiatives underline the negotiation process that must be respected to maintain the balance between the objectives of intersectoral action and citizen participation. Preliminary results also show the importance of the healthy public policies strategy that should be analyzed as one part of a three-headed concept with the two precedent objectives. We will discuss also the requirements of an interactive evaluation approach, both for the evaluators and 'evaluatees'. Evaluators must be able to communicate, motivate and negotiate and participants must take an interest in the evaluation process and agree to listen to opinions on the development of their project that may be different from their own views.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 159
页数:7
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Corbin J, 1986, PRACTICE GROUNDED TH, P102
[2]  
Fortin J. P., 1992, PROMOTION SANTE, V31, P6
[3]  
FRAISSE J, 1987, EVALUATION DYNAMIQUE
[4]  
GUBA E, 1990, 4TH GENERATION EVALU
[5]  
Kickbusch I., 1989, HLTH PROMOTION, V4, P77, DOI DOI 10.1093/HEAPRO/4.2.77
[6]  
Miles MB, 1994, ANAL DONNEES QUALITA
[7]  
Monnier E, 1987, EVALUATION ACTION PO
[8]  
PATTON MQ, 1986, UTILIZATION FOCUSED
[9]  
Stake RE., 1975, EVALUATING ARTS ED R
[10]  
YIN RK, 1989, APPLIED SOCIAL RES M, V5