HIGH-LEVELS OF POPULATION DIFFERENTIATION FOR MITOCHONDRIAL-DNA HAPLOTYPES IN PINUS-RADIATA, MURICATA, AND ATTENUATA

被引:65
作者
STRAUSS, SH
HONG, YP
HIPKINS, VD
机构
[1] Department of Forest Science, FSL 020, Oregon State University, Corvallis, 97331-7501, OR
关键词
ORGANELLE; PINE; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; CHLOROPLAST DNA; PHYLOGENY;
D O I
10.1007/BF00838716
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
We analyzed mitochondrial (mt) DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) associated with cytochrome oxidase, subunit I (coxI)-related gene sequences in 268 trees derived from 19 natural populations of three species of pines from California (USA): Monterey pine (Pinus radiata D. Don), bishop pine (P. muricata D. Don), and knobcone pine (P. attenuata Lemm.). Total genomic DNA was digested with four restriction endonucleases and probed with a 750-bp fragment of the mitochondrial coxI gene amplified from P. attenuata via the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The coxI gene is repeated at least 4 times in some populations, and all variants that we observed resulted from complex rearrangements rather than from point mutations. There was limited intrapopulation variation, but strong differentiation among populations. When applied to haplotype frequencies, Nei's gene diversity within populations (H(s)) averaged 7 % (+/- 3), and G(st) varied from 75 % for P. radiata to 96% for P. muricata. The high degree of population differentiation for mtDNA suggests that it can be a powerful marker of population differences, but its rapid rate of structural evolution appears to result from recombination among a limited number of repetitive elements-giving frequent homoplasious fragment phenotypes. The phylogenetic trees disagreed with results from chloroplast DNA, nuclear gene, and morphological studies.
引用
收藏
页码:605 / 611
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   WHY DO CHLOROPLASTS AND MITOCHONDRIA CONTAIN SO MANY COPIES OF THEIR GENOME [J].
BENDICH, AJ .
BIOESSAYS, 1987, 6 (06) :279-282
[2]  
DONG J, 1993, IN PRESS THEOR APPL
[3]   RNA EDITING IN THE MITOCHONDRIA OF A CONIFER [J].
GLAUBITZ, JC ;
CARLSON, JE .
CURRENT GENETICS, 1992, 22 (02) :163-165
[4]  
HONG YP, 1991, THESIS OREGON STATE
[5]  
LYNCH M, 1990, MOL BIOL EVOL, V7, P377
[7]   ALLOZYME DIFFERENTIATION AND BIOSYSTEMATICS OF THE CALIFORNIAN CLOSED-CONE PINES (PINUS SUBSECT OOCARPAE) [J].
MILLAR, CI ;
STRAUSS, SH ;
CONKLE, MT ;
WESTFALL, RD .
SYSTEMATIC BOTANY, 1988, 13 (03) :351-370
[8]   FURTHER STUDIES OF TURPENTINE COMPOSITION OF PINUS MURICATA IN RELATION TO ITS TAXONOMY [J].
MIROV, NT ;
ZAVARIN, E ;
SNAJBERK, K ;
COSTELLO, K .
PHYTOCHEMISTRY, 1966, 5 (03) :343-&
[9]  
Palmer JD, 1992, MOL SYSTEMATICS PLAN, P36, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-3276-7
[10]  
SEDEROFF R R, 1987, American Naturalist, V130, pS30, DOI 10.1086/284690