TORSIONAL PROPERTIES OF STAINLESS-STEEL CANAL MASTER-U AND FLEXOGATES

被引：5

作者：

CAMPS, JJ

PERTOT, WJ

机构：

[1] Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Marseille

来源：

INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL | 1994年 / 27卷 / 06期

关键词：

ENDODONTIC FILE; STIFFNESS; TWIST;

D O I：

10.1111/j.1365-2591.1994.tb00279.x

中图分类号：

R78 [口腔科学];

学科分类号：

1003 ;

摘要：

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the torsional properties of Flexogates and Canal Master U instruments. Torsion and bending tests were performed on both designs of instrument according to ANSI/ADA specification number 28 criteria and standards. Ten instruments of each size, sizes 25 to 50 were used for each test. Four parameters were measured: the moment at failure, the rotation at failure, the separation point at failure and the bending moment at a 45-degrees angle. Both instruments satisfied ANSI/ADA standards for rotation at failure and bending moment. Canal Master U satisfied ANSI/ADA standards for moment at failure in all sizes except 45 and 50. Flexogates did not satisfy these standards in all sizes except 50. Flexogates separated at the end of the shaft whereas Canal master U separated just behind the cutting head. Both instruments showed favourable physical properties for preparing root canals.

引用

页码：334 / 338

页数：5

共 18 条

[1]

Revised American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association Specification N°28 for Root Canal Files and Reamers, (1988)

[2]

Baumgartner JC, Martin H, Sabala CL, Strittmatter EJ, Wildey WL, Quigley NC, Histomorphometric comparison of canals prepared by four techniques, Journal of Endodontics, 18, pp. 530-534, (1992)

[3]

Briseno BM, Kremers L, Nitsch C, In vitro computer‐supported enlarging of root canals, Journal of Endodontics, 18, pp. 196-197, (1992)

[4]

Camps J, Pertot W, A comparison between a new instrument, the Flexogates, and the Canal Master U on root canal configuration is simulated curved canals, International Endodontic Journal, 27, pp. 21-25, (1994)

[5]

Dolan DW, Craig RG, Bending and torsion of endodontic files with rhombus cross sections, Journal of Endodontics, 8, pp. 260-264, (1982)

[6]

Gilles JA, Del Rio CE, A comparison of the Canal Master Endodontic instrument and K‐type files for enlargement of curved root canals, Journal of Endodontics, 16, pp. 561-565, (1990)

[7]

Haikely Y, Gasser P, Allemann C, Dynamic fracture of hybrid endodontic hand instruments compared with traditional files, Journal of Endodontics, 17, pp. 217-220, (1991)

[8]

Krupp JD, Brantley WA, Gerstein H, An investigation of the torsional properties of seven brands of endodontic files, Journal of Endodontics, 10, pp. 372-379, (1984)

[9]

Leseberg DA, Montgomery S, The effects of Canal Master. Flex‐R, and K‐Flex instrumentation on root canal configuration, Journal of Endodontics, 17, pp. 59-65, (1991)

[10]

Luebke NH, Brantley WA, Physical dimensions and torsional properties of rotary endodontic instruments. Gates Glidden drills, Journal of Endodontics, 16, pp. 438-441, (1990)

← 1 2 →