ANNUAL SURVIVAL RATES OF ADULT AND IMMATURE EASTERN POPULATION TUNDRA SWANS

被引:48
作者
NICHOLS, JD
BART, J
LIMPERT, RJ
SLADEN, WJL
HINES, JE
机构
[1] OHIO STATE UNIV, DEPT ZOOL, COLUMBUS, OH 43210 USA
[2] US FISH & WILDLIFE SERV, OHIO COOPERAT FISH & WILDLIFE RES UNIT, COLUMBUS, OH 43210 USA
[3] JOHNS HOPKINS UNIV, DEPT IMMUNOL & INFECT DIS, BALTIMORE, MD 21205 USA
[4] CHESAPEAKE WILDLIFE HERITAGE, EASTON, MD 21601 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/3808863
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Tundra swans (Cygnus columbianus) of the eastern population were neckbanded in Maryland, North Carolina, and Alaska from 1966 through 1990. These swans were resighted and recaptured during autumn, winter, and spring, 1966-90. Although the original motivation for this study involved swan movements, we wanted to use the resulting data to test hypotheses about sources of variation in swan survival rates. Recaptures of legbanded and neckbanded swans permitted us to estimate neckband loss rates, which were found to vary with age and sex of swans, and number of years since initial application. Estimates of annual neckband retention rate ranged from about 0.50 for adult male swans greater-than-or-equal-to 2 years after initial neckbanding to >0.96 for immature swans and adult females the first year following neckbanding. This variation in neckband loss rates prevented the simple correction of survival estimates to account for such loss. Consequently, we developed a series of multinomial models parameterized with survival, sighting, and neckband retention probabilities for use with the recapture and resighting data. Annual survival rate estimates for adult males and females were similar and very high (0.92). Estimates for immature males and immature females were 0.81 and 0.52, respectively. We recommend this model-based approach for the direct estimation of survival rates from capture-resighting data in the presence of neckband loss. We also recommend that future neckband study designs include regular recapture efforts for the purpose of estimating rates of neckband loss.
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 494
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Akaike H., 1992, 2 INT S INF THEOR, P267, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_15
[2]   BIAS AND LOSS OF PRECISION DUE TO TAG LOSS IN JOLLY-SEBER ESTIMATES FOR MARK-RECAPTURE EXPERIMENTS [J].
ARNASON, AN ;
MILLS, KH .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 1981, 38 (09) :1077-1095
[3]  
BART J, 1991, 3RD P IWRB INT SWAN, P178
[4]  
BART J, 1991, 3RD P IWRB INT SWAN, P15
[5]   A MARK-RECAPTURE SURVIVAL ANALYSIS [J].
BUCKLAND, ST .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1982, 51 (03) :833-847
[6]   A MODIFIED ANALYSIS OF THE JOLLY-SEBER CAPTURE-RECAPTURE MODEL [J].
BUCKLAND, ST .
BIOMETRICS, 1980, 36 (03) :419-435
[7]  
BURNHAM KP, 1992, WILDLIFE 2001 POPULA
[8]  
CLOBERT J, 1987, ARDEA, V75, P133
[9]   ESTIMATED SURVIVAL RATES OF CANADA GEESE WITHIN THE ATLANTIC FLYWAY [J].
HESTBECK, JB ;
MALECKI, RA .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1989, 53 (01) :91-96
[10]  
HESTBECK JB, 1990, T N AM WILDL NAT RES, V55, P350