FOCAL LIVER-LESIONS - CHARACTERIZATION WITH NONENHANCED AND DYNAMIC CONTRAST MATERIAL-ENHANCED MR-IMAGING

被引:195
作者
HAMM, B
THOENI, RF
GOULD, RG
BERNARDINO, ME
LUNING, M
SAINI, S
MAHFOUZ, AE
TAUPITZ, M
WOLF, KJ
机构
[1] EMORY UNIV,DEPT RADIOL,ATLANTA,GA
[2] HUMBOLDT UNIV BERLIN,DEPT RADIOL,BERLIN,GERMANY
[3] HARVARD UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT RADIOL,BOSTON,MA 02115
[4] INST DIAGNOST FORSCH,DEPT RADIOL,BERLIN,GERMANY
[5] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,DEPT RADIOL,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94143
关键词
GADOLINIUM LIVER NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS; LIVER NEOPLASMS; SECONDARY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE (MR); PULSE SEQUENCES; TISSUE CHARACTERIZATION; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVE (ROC);
D O I
10.1148/radiology.190.2.8284392
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To evaluate prospectively the diagnostic accuracy of nonenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in characterization of hepatic lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-five patients with benign and 52 patients with malignant focal liver lesions underwent examination at 1.5 T that comprised nonenhanced and dynamic contrast material-enhanced images. Four experienced radiologists independently read the different sets of images without and with knowledge of clinical history. RESULTS: Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging added information to nonenhanced MR studies and thereby improved distinction between benign and malignant lesions (P < .05). Knowledge of clinical data further improved lesion characterization with nonenhanced and combined nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced MR imaging (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging is a useful adjunct for characterization of hepatic lesions. Knowledge of clinical history still has a decisive effect on interpretation of MR images of the liver.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 423
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
ABBAS Y A, 1991, Magnetic Resonance Quarterly, V7, P275
[2]   FOCAL HEPATIC-LESIONS - DIFFERENTIATION WITH MR-IMAGING AT 0.5 T [J].
BROWN, JJ ;
LEE, JM ;
LEE, JKT ;
VANLOM, KJ ;
MALCHOW, SC .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 179 (03) :675-679
[3]   SMALL HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA VERSUS SMALL CAVERNOUS HEMANGIOMA - DIFFERENTIATION WITH MR IMAGING AT 2.0 T [J].
CHOI, BI ;
HAN, MC ;
KIM, CW .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 176 (01) :103-106
[4]   HEPATIC-TUMORS - QUANTITATIVE TISSUE CHARACTERIZATION WITH MR IMAGING [J].
EGGLIN, TK ;
RUMMENY, E ;
STARK, DD ;
WITTENBERG, J ;
SAINI, S ;
FERRUCCI, JT .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 176 (01) :107-110
[5]   HEPATIC CAVERNOUS HEMANGIOMA - MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING - WORK IN PROGRESS [J].
GLAZER, GM ;
AISEN, AM ;
FRANCIS, IR ;
GYVES, JW ;
LANDE, I ;
ADLER, DD .
RADIOLOGY, 1985, 155 (02) :417-420
[6]  
HAASE A, 1986, J MAGN RESON, V67, P217
[7]   DIFFERENTIATION OF HEPATIC HEMANGIOMAS FROM METASTASES BY DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED MR IMAGING [J].
HAMM, B ;
FISCHER, E ;
TAUPITZ, M .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1990, 14 (02) :205-216
[8]   THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) :29-36
[9]   DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN SMALL HEPATIC HEMANGIOMAS AND METASTASES ON MR IMAGES - IMPORTANCE OF SIZE-SPECIFIC QUANTITATIVE CRITERIA [J].
ITOH, K ;
SAINI, S ;
HAHN, PF ;
IMAM, N ;
FERRUCCI, JT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 155 (01) :61-66
[10]   DISTINCTION OF HEPATIC CAVERNOUS HEMANGIOMA FROM HEPATIC METASTASES WITH MR IMAGING [J].
LI, KC ;
GLAZER, GM ;
QUINT, LE ;
FRANCIS, IR ;
AISEN, AM ;
ENSMINGER, WD ;
BOOKSTEIN, FL .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 169 (02) :409-415