COSTS AND BENEFITS OF GROUP LIVING IN A RECENTLY SOCIAL UNGULATE - THE ALASKAN MOOSE

被引:147
作者
MOLVAR, EM [1 ]
BOWYER, RT [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV ALASKA,DEPT BIOL & WILDLIFE,FAIRBANKS,AK 99775
关键词
ALASKAN MOOSE; ALCES-ALCES-GIGAS; FORAGING EFFICIENCY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; GROUP LIVING; DENALI-NATIONAL-PARK; ALASKA;
D O I
10.2307/1382509
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
Risk of predation is considered a major influence on foraging behavior and the evolution of social groups. We measured foraging efficiency (percentage of active time spent foraging) for Alaskan moose (Alces alces gigas) in various categories of predation risk in Denali National Park, Alaska, in 1991. For a particular group size, foraging efficiency declined significantly with distance from cover. Foraging selectivity by moose for diamondleaf willow (Salix planifolia pulchra) also decreased as distance from cover increased. Adult females accompanied by young foraged less efficiently than either females without young or adult males. Group size was positively correlated with distance from cover, which suggests that social grouping in moose is an adaptation to increased predation risk. Surprisingly, group size was inversely related to foraging efficiency because of the overriding negative effects of aggressive behavior. This finding contrasts with behavioral trends in more social ungulates, which display increased foraging efficiency with increasing group size. We suggest that the lowered foraging efficiency in Alaskan moose is a result of the recent evolution of gregarious behavior in this subspecies and that increased foraging efficiency within groups of social ungulates may be a subsequent adaptation rather than an a priori selective advantage that led to the evolution of social behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:621 / 630
页数:10
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
ALADOS CL, 1985, Z TIERPSYCHOL, V68, P58
[2]  
ALBERT DM, 1991, WILDLIFE SOC B, V19, P339
[3]   OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF BEHAVIOR - SAMPLING METHODS [J].
ALTMANN, J .
BEHAVIOUR, 1974, 49 (3-4) :227-267
[4]  
ALTMANN M., 1958, ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, V6, P155, DOI 10.1016/0003-3472(58)90045-9
[5]  
ALTMANN MARGARET, 1959, JOUR MAMMAL, V40, P420, DOI 10.2307/1376569
[6]   FORAGING RANGE IN MICE AND VOLES - THE ROLE OF RISK [J].
ANDERSON, PK .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE, 1986, 64 (12) :2645-2653
[7]   MARMOTS AND COYOTES - BEHAVIOR OF PREY AND PREDATOR [J].
ARMITAGE, KB .
JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 1982, 63 (03) :503-505
[8]  
BASKIN LM, 1987, VILTREVY S, V1, P377
[9]   GROUP-SIZE, FORAGING, AND ANTIPREDATOR PLOYS - ANALYSIS OF BIGHORN SHEEP DECISIONS [J].
BERGER, J .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1978, 4 (01) :91-99
[10]   PREGNANCY INCENTIVES, PREDATION CONSTRAINTS AND HABITAT SHIFTS - EXPERIMENTAL AND FIELD EVIDENCE FOR WILD BIGHORN SHEEP [J].
BERGER, J .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1991, 41 :61-+