SCREENING CHICKPEA FOR IRON CHLOROSIS RESISTANCE USING BICARBONATE IN NUTRIENT SOLUTION TO SIMULATE CALCAREOUS SOILS

被引:22
作者
CHANEY, RL
HAMZE, MH
BELL, PF
机构
[1] Environmental Chemistry Laboratory, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD
[2] Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Lebanese University, Beirut
[3] Department of Agronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD
关键词
D O I
10.1080/01904169209364458
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Chaney and Coulombe introduced an effective method to screen dicot genotypes for resistance to bicarbonate-induced Fe-deficiency chlorosis. Their method used low levels of FeEDDHA in a nutrient solution with high levels of Ca and Mg salts to mimic the soil solution of problem soils in Iowa and Minnesota. The combination of low Fe supply and high NaHCO3 induced Fe-stress. Only chlorosis-resistant soybean and bean cultivars were able to de-repress their Fe-stress-response enough to obtain adequate Fe and remain green. Susceptible genotypes became severely chlorotic. Although Fehr and Cianzio et al. found the method reliable, commercial breeders had poorer reproducibility. As more highly improved Fe-chlorosis resistance soybean genotypes were developed, lower FeEDDHA and/or higher bicarbonate were required in the screening solutions. With these very low FeEDDHA levels (1.5-2 muM), small amounts of soil or dust contamination of the solutions could markedly shift the screening results. With the development of chelator-buffered nutrient solutions which supplied adequate amounts of all required nutrients, it became possible to use DTPA-buffering of Fe rather than EDDHA. DTPA buffers Fe2+ much more strongly than EDDHA, so that 25 muM FeDTPA is used in normal screening rather than 1.5-2 muM FeEDDHA. In the present work, we tested FeDTPA levels required to screen chickpea and soybean cultivars for relative chlorosis resistance. Thirteen chickpea genotypes with a range of chlorosis-susceptibility demonstrated in the field, and 2 indicator genotypes of soybean and 1 tomato were screened at 60, 25, and 15 muM FeDTPA and 10 mM NaHCO, compared to a control. Highly chlorosis-susceptible chickpea genotypes were chlorotic at 60 muM, while only the most resistant were green at 15 muM FeDTPA. This indicates that bicarbonate is probably the soil factor which induces chlorosis in chickpea in the field. Soybean genotypes showed chlorosis severity similar to field ratings and FeEDDHA screening solution results, while tomato remained green at 15 muM Fe. Results indicate that dicots may be effectively screened using Fe-DTPA in DTPA-buffered solutions, and that the method is sufficiently robust for commercial breeders.
引用
收藏
页码:2045 / 2062
页数:18
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1987, IRON TRANSPORT MICRO
[2]   BREEDING FOR FE EFFICIENCY - USE OF INDICATOR PLANTS [J].
BROWN, JC ;
WANN, EV .
JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 1982, 5 (4-7) :623-635
[3]   TITANIUM DETERMINATION FOR CORRECTION OF PLANT-SAMPLE CONTAMINATION BY SOIL [J].
CARY, EE ;
GRUNES, DL ;
BOHMAN, VR ;
SANCHIRICO, CA .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1986, 78 (05) :933-936
[4]  
CHANEY RL, 1989, HORTSCIENCE, V24, P565
[5]   USE OF BICARBONATE IN SCREENING SOYBEANS FOR RESISTANCE TO IRON CHLOROSIS [J].
COULOMBE, BA ;
CHANEY, RL ;
WIEBOLD, WJ .
JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 1984, 7 (1-5) :411-425
[6]   BICARBONATE DIRECTLY INDUCES IRON CHLOROSIS IN SUSCEPTIBLE SOYBEAN CULTIVARS [J].
COULOMBE, BA ;
CHANEY, RL ;
WIEBOLD, WJ .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1984, 48 (06) :1297-1301
[7]   EFFECTIVENESS OF NUTRIENT-SOLUTION EVALUATION FOR RECURRENT SELECTION FOR FE EFFICIENCY OF SOYBEAN [J].
DRAGONUK, MB ;
FEHR, WR ;
JESSEN, HJ .
CROP SCIENCE, 1989, 29 (04) :952-955
[8]  
Gowda C. L. L., 1986, International Chickpea Newsletter, P7
[9]   EVALUATION OF CHICKPEA (CICER-ARIETINUM-L) GENOTYPES FOR RESISTANCE OF LIME-INDUCED CHLOROSIS [J].
HAMZE, M ;
RYAN, J ;
MIKDASHI, R ;
SOLH, M .
JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 1987, 10 (9-16) :1031-1039
[10]   IRON CONTENT DURING LIME-INDUCED CHLOROSIS WITH 2 CITRUS ROOTSTOCKS [J].
HAMZE, M ;
NIMAH, M .
JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 1982, 5 (4-7) :797-804