MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENING - REASONS FOR RECALL AND THE INFLUENCE OF EXPERIENCE ON RECALL IN THE FINNISH SYSTEM

被引:14
作者
PAMILO, M [1 ]
ANTTINEN, I [1 ]
SOIVA, M [1 ]
ROIHA, M [1 ]
SURAMO, I [1 ]
机构
[1] CANC SOC FINLAND,CTR MAMMOG SCREENING,SF-00120 HELSINKI,FINLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0009-9260(05)80596-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The reasons for recall and the influence of experience on recall were studied in 579 women (3.21%) recalled from mammography screening. The proportion of recalls for further studies was the greatest (6.30%) at the onset of screening. With increased experience, the proportion decreased by stages and in the second screening round it was only 2.04%. The proportion of cases referred for surgical biopsy in the first screening round was 0.7% and the proportion of screening-detected breast cancers was 0.52%. These change little with increasing experience. In the second screening round, however, the proportion of referrals for surgical biopsy (0.43% of those screened) and of screening-detected breast cancers, (0.30%) were both low. A tumour-like density was the commonest finding resulting in recall for further studies, and the number caused by superimposition of normal parenchymal structures decreased with experience, while the proportion of breast cancers and benign tumours increased. The proportion of cases with parenchymal distortion resulting in recall for further studies was similar in both screening rounds but the number of those referred for biopsy fell dramatically in the second screening round. The number of recalls for microcalcification also fell with experience and the proportion of breast cancers in this group increased over the two screening rounds. A high ratio of malignancies in surgical biopsies can be expected when the radiologists undertaking primary screening also perform all further studies. © 1990 The Royal College of Radiologists, 38 Portland Place, London W1N 3DG, UK. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:384 / 387
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] BREAST-CANCER SCREENING WITH MAMMOGRAPHY - POPULATION-BASED, RANDOMIZED TRIAL WITH MAMMOGRAPHY AS THE ONLY SCREENING-MODE
    ANDERSSON, I
    ANDREN, L
    HILDELL, J
    LINELL, F
    LJUNGQVIST, U
    PETTERSSON, H
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1979, 132 (02) : 273 - 276
  • [2] ANDERSSON I, 1981, ACTA RADIOL, V21, P407
  • [3] SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF 1ST SCREEN MAMMOGRAPHY IN THE CANADIAN NATIONAL BREAST SCREENING STUDY - A PRELIMINARY-REPORT FROM 5 CENTERS
    BAINES, CJ
    MILLER, AB
    WALL, C
    MCFARLANE, DV
    SIMOR, IS
    JONG, R
    SHAPIRO, BJ
    AUDET, L
    PETITCLERC, M
    OUIMETOLIVA, D
    LADOUCEUR, J
    HEBERT, G
    MINUK, T
    HARDY, G
    STANDING, HK
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1986, 160 (02) : 295 - 298
  • [4] BREAST-CANCER DETECTION - ONE VERSUS 2 VIEWS
    BASSETT, LW
    BUNNELL, DH
    JAHANSHAHI, R
    GOLD, RH
    ARNDT, RD
    LINSMAN, J
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1987, 165 (01) : 95 - 97
  • [5] THE DOM PROJECT FOR THE EARLY DETECTION OF BREAST-CANCER, UTRECHT, THE NETHERLANDS
    DEWAARD, F
    COLLETTE, HJA
    ROMBACH, JJ
    BAANDERSVANHALEWIJN, EA
    HONING, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1984, 37 (01): : 1 - 44
  • [6] Fagerberg CJG, 1988, SCREENING BREAST CAN, P33
  • [7] MILLER AB, 1988, SCREENING BREAST CAN, P51
  • [8] THE PREDICTIVE VALUE OF POSITIVE TEST-RESULTS IN SCREENING FOR BREAST-CANCER BY MAMMOGRAPHY IN THE NIJMEGEN PROGRAM
    PEETERS, PHM
    VERBEEK, ALM
    HENDRIKS, JHCL
    HOLLAND, R
    MRAVUNAC, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1987, 56 (05) : 667 - 671
  • [9] SCREENING FOR BREAST-CANCER IN NIJMEGEN - REPORT OF 6 SCREENING ROUNDS, 1975-1986
    PEETERS, PHM
    VERBEEK, ALM
    HENDRIKS, JHCL
    VANBON, MJH
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1989, 43 (02) : 226 - 230
  • [10] BASE-LINE SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY - ONE VS 2 VIEWS PER BREAST
    SICKLES, EA
    WEBER, WN
    GALVIN, HB
    OMINSKY, SH
    SOLLITTO, RA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1986, 147 (06) : 1149 - 1153