EFFECTS OF PERIOPERATIVE ANALGESIC TECHNIQUE ON RATE OF RECOVERY AFTER COLON SURGERY

被引:308
作者
LIU, SS
CARPENTER, RL
MACKEY, DC
THIRLBY, RC
RUPP, SM
SHINE, TSJ
FEINGLASS, NG
METZGER, PP
FULMER, JT
SMITH, SL
机构
[1] VIRGINIA MASON MED CTR, DEPT SURG, SEATTLE, WA 98111 USA
[2] MAYO CLIN JACKSONVILLE, DEPT ANESTHESIOL, JACKSONVILLE, AL USA
[3] MAYO CLIN JACKSONVILLE, DEPT SURG, JACKSONVILLE, AL USA
关键词
ANALGESIA; EPIDURAL; ANESTHETICS; LOCAL; BUPIVACAINE; OPIOIDS; MORPHINE; ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES; PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; GASTROINTESTINAL MOTILITY; PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE ILEUS;
D O I
10.1097/00000542-199510000-00015
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Choice of perioperative analgesia may affect the rate of recovery of gastrointestinal function and thus duration and cost of hospitalization after colonic surgery. Methods: Fifty-four patients undergoing partial colectomy surgery were randomized into four groups. All groups received a standardized general anesthetic. Group MB received a preoperative bolus of epidural bupivacaine and morphine followed by an infusion of morphine and bupivacaine. Group M received a preoperative bolus of epidural morphine followed by an infusion of morphine. Group B received a preoperative bolus of bupivacaine followed by an infusion of bupivacaine, Group P received a preoperative bolus of intravenous morphine followed by intravenous patient-controlled morphine postoperatively. All patients participated in a standardized recovery program to minimize the influence of nonanalgesic factors on recovery of gastrointestinal function. All epidural groups were double-blinded. All patients were deemed ready for discharge according to prospectively defined criteria. Results: Groups B and MB reported superior analgesia with activity (P < 0.01). Group M had a greater incidence of pruritus (P < 0.05). Group B had a greater incidence of orthostatic hypotension (P = 0.04). Groups B and MB recovered gastrointestinal function and fulfilled discharge criteria approximately 1.5 days earlier than groups M and P (P < 0.005). Conclusions: Epidural analgesia with bupivacaine and morphine provided the best balance of analgesia and side effects while accelerating postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function and time to fulfillment of discharge criteria after colon surgery in relatively healthy patients within the context of a multimodal recovery program.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 765
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] EFFECT OF CONTINUOUS POSTOPERATIVE EPIDURAL ANALGESIA ON INTESTINAL MOTILITY
    AHN, H
    BRONGE, A
    JOHANSSON, K
    YGGE, H
    LINDHAGEN, J
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1988, 75 (12) : 1176 - 1178
  • [2] COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF OPIATE AGONISTS ON PROXIMAL AND DISTAL COLONIC MOTILITY IN DOGS
    BARDON, T
    RUCKEBUSCH, Y
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1985, 110 (03) : 329 - 334
  • [3] BAYLISS W, 1988, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V24, P138
  • [4] BIGLER D, 1985, ANAESTHESIA, V40, P278
  • [5] BOWER RH, 1986, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V121, P1040
  • [6] EPIDURAL ANALGESIA IN COLONIC SURGERY - RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE-STUDY
    BREDTMANN, RD
    HERDEN, HN
    TEICHMANN, W
    MOECKE, HP
    KNIESEL, B
    BAETGEN, R
    TECKLENBURG, A
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1990, 77 (06) : 638 - 642
  • [7] CARPENTER RL, 1994, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V81, pA1025
  • [8] CASASOLA OD, 1994, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V81, P368
  • [9] MORPHINE AND HYDROMORPHONE EPIDURAL ANALGESIA - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED COMPARISON
    CHAPLAN, SR
    DUNCAN, SR
    BRODSKY, JB
    BROSE, WG
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 77 (06) : 1090 - 1094
  • [10] PROPHYLACTIC POSTOPERATIVE NASOGASTRIC DECOMPRESSION - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF ITS REQUIREMENT AND THE INFLUENCE OF CIMETIDINE IN 200 PATIENTS
    CHEADLE, WG
    VITALE, GC
    MACKIE, CR
    CUSCHIERI, A
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1985, 202 (03) : 361 - 366