EFFECT OF PREINCISION VERSUS POSTINCISION INFILTRATION WITH BUPIVACAINE ON POSTOPERATIVE PAIN

被引:31
作者
VICTORY, RA [1 ]
GAJRAJ, NM [1 ]
VANELSTRAETE, A [1 ]
PACE, NA [1 ]
JOHNSON, ER [1 ]
WHITE, PF [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV TEXAS,SW MED CTR DALLAS,DEPT ANESTHESIOL & PAIN MANAGEMENT,DALLAS,TX 75235
关键词
ANESTHESIA; LOCAL; ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES; INFILTRATION; BUPIVACAINE; PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE;
D O I
10.1016/0952-8180(94)00046-7
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study Objective: To compare the efficacy of preincision wound infiltration with bupivacaine to wound infiltration at the end of the operation. Design: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Setting: University medical center. Patients: 56 ASA status I and II women scheduled for abdominal hysterectomy were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups. Interventions: Group 1 (control) received no local anesthetic infiltration. Group 2 received subcutaneous infiltration with 40 mi of bupivacaine 0.5% (pH 6.9) 15 minutes prior to incision. Group 3 received wound infiltration with a similar solution at the end of surgery. Anesthesia was induced with thiopental 3.0 mg/kg IV, droperidol 50 mu g/kg IV, and sufentanil 0.5 mu g/kg IV, and maintained with nitrous oxide 67% in oxygen and sufentanil 0.1 mu g/kg IV boluses as required. Postoperative pain was treated with morphine via a patient-controlled analgesia delivery system for 24 hours, followed by oral hydrocodone for 3 days. Measurements and Main Results: The opioid consumption was recorded for 4 days postoperatively. Pain scores were measured at 4 to 8-hour intervals using 100 mm visual analog scales. There was no difference in either the opioid analgesic requirements or the pain scores between the three study groups. Conclusions: Wound infiltration, either preincision or postincision, had no clinically significant effect on the pain scores or analgesic requirements following abdominal hysterectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 196
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Jayr, Thomas, Rey, Farhat, Lasser, Bourgain, Postoperative pulmonary complications. Epidural analgesia using bupivacaine and opioids versus parenteral opioids, Anesthesiology, 78, pp. 666-676, (1993)
[2]  
Yamaguchi, Watanabe, Fukuda, Takahashi, Motokawa, Ishizawa, Minimal effective dose of intrathecal morphine for pain relief following transabdominal hysterectomy, Anesth Analg, 68, pp. 537-540, (1989)
[3]  
Parker, Holtmann, White, Effects of a nighttime opioid infusion with PCA therapy on patient comfort and analgesic requirements after abdominal hysterectomy, Anesthesiology, 76, pp. 362-367, (1992)
[4]  
White, Subcutaneous-PCA: an alternative to IV-PCA for postoperative pain management, Clin J Pain, 6, pp. 297-300, (1990)
[5]  
Trotter, Hayes-Gregson, Robinson, Cole, Coley, Fell, Wound infiltration of local anaesthetic after lower segment caesarean section, Anaesthesia, 46, pp. 404-407, (1991)
[6]  
Partridge, Stabile, The effects of incisional bupivacaine on postoperative narcotic requirements, oxygen saturation and length of stay in the post-anesthesia care unit, Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 34, pp. 486-491, (1990)
[7]  
Levack, Holmes, Robertson, Abdominal wound perfusion for the relief of postoperative pain, Br J Anaesth, 58, pp. 615-619, (1986)
[8]  
Tverskoy, Cozacov, Ayache, Bradley, Kissin, Postoperative pain after inguinal herniorraphy with different types of anesthesia, Anesth Analg, 70, pp. 29-35, (1990)
[9]  
Jebeles, Reilly, Gutierrez, Bradley, Kissin, The effect of pre-incisional infiltration of tonsils with bupivacaine on the pain following tonsillectomy under general anesthesia, Pain, 47, pp. 305-308, (1991)
[10]  
Ejlersen, Andersen, Eliasen, Mogensen, A comparison between preincisional and postincisional lidocaine infiltration and postoperative pain, Anesth Analg, 74, pp. 495-498, (1992)