EFFECT OF STANDING ORDERS ON PARAMEDIC SCENE TIME FOR TRAUMA PATIENTS

被引:7
作者
GRATTON, MC
BETHKE, RA
WATSON, WA
GADDIS, GM
机构
[1] Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO
[2] Division of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO
[3] Truman Medical Center-West, Kansas City, MO
[4] Metropolitan Ambulance Services Trust, Kansas City, MO
关键词
SCENE TIME; TRAUMA; STANDING ORDERS;
D O I
10.1016/S0196-0644(05)81071-6
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: To determine if a protocol change that allowed paramedics to perform certain procedures before base station contact (standing orders) would decrease scene time in trauma patients. Design: Retrospective review of case series. Setting: A single-tiered, all advanced life support emergency medical services system. Intervention: Implementation with standing orders for invasive procedures. Type of participants: All physiologically unstable trauma patients transported to a Level I trauma center by ambulance. Measurements and main results: One hundred ninety-seven patients met the inclusion criteria - 87 before and 110 after the initiation of standing orders. Mean scene times for the control group (15.3 +/- 8.4 minutes) and for the standing orders group (15.1 +/- 7.6 minutes) were similar (P = .18). The power of the study to detect a two-minute difference in scene time was .92. Scene time was not influenced by mechanism of injury, and the number of procedures performed on patients was similar between the two groups. Conclusion: Standing orders did not decrease scene time in physiologically unstable trauma patients. Further study is necessary to delineate the factors that actually contribute to on-scene time and the factors that are important in determining whether standing orders or on-line medical contact should be used.
引用
收藏
页码:1306 / 1309
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Smith, Bodai, Hill, Et al., Prehospital stabilization of critically injured patients: A failed concept, J Trauma, 25, pp. 65-70, (1985)
[2]  
Clevenger, Yarbrough, Reines, Resuscitative thoracostomy: The effect of field time on outcome, J Trauma, 28, pp. 441-445, (1988)
[3]  
Ivatury, Nallathaubi, Roberg, Et al., Penetrating thoracic injuries: In field stabilization vs prompt transport, J Trauma, 27, pp. 1066-1073, (1987)
[4]  
Border, Et al., Panel: Prehospital trauma care — Stabilize or scoop and run, J Trauma, 23, pp. 708-711, (1983)
[5]  
Reines, Bartlett, Chudy, Et al., Is advanced life support appropriate for victims of motor vehicle accidents?, The South Carolina Highway Trauma Project, 28, pp. 563-570, (1988)
[6]  
Honigman, Roheuder, Moore, Et al., Prehospital advanced trauma life support for penetrating cardiac wounds, Ann Emerg Med, 19, pp. 145-150, (1990)
[7]  
Jacobs, Sinclair, Beiser, Et al., Prehospital advanced life support: Benefits in trauma, J Trauma, 24, pp. 8-13, (1984)
[8]  
Hedges, Feero, Moore, Et al., Factors contributing to paramedic on-scene time during evaluation and management of blunt trauma, Am J Emerg Med, 6, pp. 443-448, (1988)
[9]  
Donovan, Cline, Foster, Et al., Prehospital care by EMTs and EMT-Is in a rural setting: Prolongation of scene times by ALS procedures, Ann Emerg Med, 18, pp. 495-500, (1989)
[10]  
Pointer, Osur, Effect of standing orders on field times, Ann Emery Med, 18, pp. 1119-1211, (1989)