IMPACT OF OVERALL TREATMENT TIME OF FRACTIONATED-IRRADIATION ON LOCAL-CONTROL OF HUMAN FADU SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA IN NUDE-MICE

被引:57
作者
BAUMANN, M
LIERTZ, C
BAISCH, H
WIEGEL, T
LORENZEN, J
ARPS, H
机构
[1] UNIV HAMBURG HOSP,INST BIOPHYS & RADIAT BIOL,D-20246 HAMBURG,GERMANY
[2] STADT KLINIKUM FULDA,INST PATHOL,FULDA,GERMANY
关键词
FRACTIONATED RADIOTHERAPY; REPOPULATION; HUMAN TUMOR XENOGRAFTS; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; TCD50; T-POT;
D O I
10.1016/0167-8140(94)90100-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
A series of experiments were performed to determine the impact of overall treatment time on local control of human FaDu squamous cell carcinoma irradiated with 30 fractions under ambient conditions in nude mice. The TCD50 increased with treatment time between 15 days and 10 weeks from 43 Gy to 102 Gy. The data can be well described by a single linear function. The dose recovered per day is 1.0 Gy. However, the data can also be adequately fitted by two components with an initial delay of about 30 days followed by a steep increase at a rate of 1.5 Gy per day. Assuming that the increase of TCD50 is solely caused by repopulation of clonogenic tumor cells, and that the cellular radiation sensitivity in vitro reflects the radiation sensitivity of FaDu cells in vivo, the doubling time of clonogenic tumor cells during treatment is estimated to be similar to 1.8 days for the one-component model and, after an initial delay, similar to 1.2 days for the two-component model. Both values are shorter than the doubling time of clonogenic cells in untreated FaDu tumors and similar to the potential doubling time determined by flow cytometry after BrdUrd labelling. It is concluded that the dose necessary to control FaDu squamous cell carcinoma increases considerably with increasing time of a fractionated radiation treatment. It appears most likely that this increase is caused by repopulation of clonogenic tumor cells; however, other mechanisms such as an increasing fraction of hypoxic tumor cells can not be ruled out at present.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 143
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   INTRATUMORAL HETEROGENEITY OF S-PHASE TRANSITION IN SOLID TUMORS DETERMINED BY BROMODEOXYURIDINE LABELING AND FLOW-CYTOMETRY [J].
BAISCH, H ;
OTTO, U .
CELL PROLIFERATION, 1993, 26 (05) :439-448
[2]   RESPONSE OF HUMAN SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA XENOGRAFTS OF DIFFERENT SIZES TO IRRADIATION - RELATIONSHIP OF CLONOGENIC CELLS, CELLULAR RADIATION SENSITIVITY INVIVO, AND TUMOR RESCUING UNITS [J].
BAUMANN, M ;
DUBOIS, W ;
SUIT, HD .
RADIATION RESEARCH, 1990, 123 (03) :325-330
[3]  
BAUMANN M, 1992, CONTR ONCOL, V42, P98
[4]   RESPONSE OF XENOGRAFTS OF HUMAN-MALIGNANT GLIOMAS AND SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMAS TO FRACTIONATED-IRRADIATION [J].
BAUMANN, M ;
DUBOIS, W ;
PU, A ;
FREEMAN, J ;
SUIT, HD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1992, 23 (04) :803-809
[5]  
BAUMANN M, 1994, EXP STRAHIENER KIM S, V3, P19
[6]   SHOULD TUMORS BE CLAMPED IN RADIOBIOLOGICAL FRACTIONATION EXPERIMENTS [J].
BECKBORNHOLDT, HP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (03) :675-682
[7]   INFLUENCE OF TREATMENT TIME ON THE RESPONSE OF RAT RHABDOMYOSARCOMA R1H TO FRACTIONATED-IRRADIATION [J].
BECKBORNHOLDT, HP ;
OMNICZYNSKI, M ;
THEIS, E ;
VOGLER, H ;
WURSCHMIDT, F .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1991, 30 (01) :57-63
[8]   CLAMPING AND ACCELERATED REPOPULATION IN EXPERIMENTAL-TUMORS DURING RADIOTHERAPY - RESPONSE [J].
BECKBORNHOLDT, HP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1993, 25 (01) :154-155
[9]   THE PREDICTIVE VALUE OF CELL KINETIC MEASUREMENTS IN A EUROPEAN TRIAL OF ACCELERATED FRACTIONATION IN ADVANCED HEAD AND NECK TUMORS - AN INTERIM-REPORT [J].
BEGG, AC ;
HOFLAND, I ;
MOONEN, L ;
BARTELINK, H ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
BONTEMPS, P ;
LEFUR, R ;
VANDENBOGAERT, W ;
CASPERS, R ;
VANGLABBEKE, M ;
HORIOT, JC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1990, 19 (06) :1449-1453
[10]   A METHOD TO MEASURE THE DURATION OF DNA-SYNTHESIS AND THE POTENTIAL DOUBLING TIME FROM A SINGLE SAMPLE [J].
BEGG, AC ;
MCNALLY, NJ ;
SHRIEVE, DC ;
KARCHER, H .
CYTOMETRY, 1985, 6 (06) :620-626