CURRICULUM EVALUATION IN NURSING-EDUCATION - A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

被引:10
作者
CHAVASSE, J
机构
[1] QUEENS UNIV BELFAST,DEPT EDUC,BELFAST BT7 1NN,ANTRIM,NORTH IRELAND
[2] QUEENS UNIV BELFAST,DEPT NURSING STUDIES,BELFAST BT7 1NN,ANTRIM,NORTH IRELAND
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01182.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Most curriculum evaluations in the literature have been reported by nurse evaluators; aims, criteria and methods are drawn chiefly from sociology, general education or management. There is an absence of studies exploring relevance to national health care need, nurses' accountability to their clients and outcomes of curricula. There appears to be much interest in innovatory programmes, students' experiences and sociological understandings, with some concern for specific aspects of curricula generally recognized as being problematic. The number of qualitative or mixed methodology studies is compatible with process curricula and with academic and professional validation.
引用
收藏
页码:1024 / 1031
页数:8
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
ALEXANDER MF, 1983, LEARNING NURSE
[2]  
ALLEN HO, 1978, NURSE TRAINING ENTER
[3]  
ALLEN M, 1977, EVALUATION ED PROGRA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1989, TAVISTOCK, DOI DOI 10.1111/1467-9566.EP10844194
[5]  
BLANK JJ, 1985, THESIS U ILLINOIS IL
[7]  
CLARK T, 1983, J NURS EDUC, V22, P54
[8]  
COOPER K, 1976, CURRICULUM EVALUATIO
[9]  
CORK M, 1989, HLTH VISITOR ED TRAI
[10]   IN SEARCH OF MORE COMPLETE ANSWERS TO RESEARCH QUESTIONS - QUANTITATIVE VERSUS QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHODS - IS THERE A WAY FORWARD [J].
CORNER, J .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1991, 16 (06) :718-727