A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF MULTIATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING METHODOLOGIES

被引：40

作者：

KARNI, R ^{[1
]}

SANCHEZ, P ^{[1
]}

TUMMALA, VMR ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIV,YPSILANTI,MI 48197

来源：

THEORY AND DECISION | 1990年 / 29卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1007/BF00126802

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

Three "real life" cases are considered in this paper to apply and compare the rankings obtained by the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and other Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques such as Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), ELECTRE and Weighted Linear Assignment Method (WLAM). The results indicated that the AHP, SAW, and ELECTRE rankings do not differ significantly, however, the WLAM tends to exhibit more disagreement. However, because of the limited nature of this study, we do not suggest this as a general conclusion. © 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

引用

页码：203 / 222

页数：20

共 9 条

[1] A COMPARISON OF THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS AND A SIMPLE MULTIATTRIBUTE VALUE FUNCTION [J].