CONTEXT EFFECTS IN A DOUBLE-WEAK THEORY OF SPEECH-PERCEPTION

被引:21
作者
NEAREY, TM
机构
关键词
SPEECH PERCEPTION; CONTEXT EFFECTS; COARTICULATION; PERCEPTUAL COMPENSATION;
D O I
10.1177/002383099203500213
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
The present study provides an elaboration of the "double-weak" theory of speech perception proposed by Nearey (1990, 1991). In this framework, the objects of speech perception (and production) are viewed as neither primarily auditory nor primarily gestural; rather, they are abstract, symbolic elements lawfully constrained to map onto relatively simple (but not entirely transparent) patterns in both domains. Speech cannot be understood unless both articulation and acoustics are considered: Many production strategies appear to be directed at achieving acoustically-oriented goals, yet most context effects in speech perception seem to be motivated by the consequences of gestural overlap. The double-weak framework suggests that speech perception and speech production are less-than-perfect inverses of each other. Despite long-term accommodation of each for the demands of the other, real-time production and perception may operate as autonomous subsystems. A family of perceptual models is discussed that provides varying degrees of approximation to "ideal solutions" (in the sense of minimizing error rate) to classifying production data exhibiting contextual interactions. Members of this family that provide substantial, yet incomplete, compensation for the consequences of gestural overlap appear to be adequate to account for the results of many speech perception experiments. Such partial perceptual compensation allows, in principle, for the kind of imperfect "error correction" discussed by Ohala (1981, 1990) in conjunction with hypo- and hypercorrection phenomena.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 171
页数:19
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   ON THE SUFFICIENCY OF COMPOUND TARGET SPECIFICATION OF ISOLATED VOWELS AND VOWELS IN BVB SYLLABLES [J].
ANDRUSKI, JE ;
NEAREY, TM .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1992, 91 (01) :390-410
[2]  
BORDEN GJ, 1984, SPEECH SCI PRIMER
[3]  
Browman C. P., 1986, PHONOLOGY, V3, P219, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0952675700000658
[4]   GESTURAL SPECIFICATION USING DYNAMICALLY-DEFINED ARTICULATORY STRUCTURES [J].
BROWMAN, CP ;
GOLDSTEIN, L .
JOURNAL OF PHONETICS, 1990, 18 (03) :299-320
[5]  
Elman JeffreyL., 1986, INVARIANCE VARIABILI, P360
[6]  
Fant G., 1960, ACOUSTIC THEORY SPEE
[7]  
Fowler C., 1986, INVARIANCE VARIABILI, P123
[8]  
FOWLER CA, 1986, J PHONETICS, V14, P3, DOI 10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30607-2
[9]   REVIEW OF TEXT-TO-SPEECH CONVERSION FOR ENGLISH [J].
KLATT, DH .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1987, 82 (03) :737-793
[10]  
KLATT DH, 1989, LEXICAL REPRESENTATI, P169