BIOLOGIC AGGRESSIVENESS OF PALPABLE AND NONPALPABLE PROSTATE-CANCER - ASSESSMENT WITH ENDOSONOGRAPHY

被引:10
作者
BARAN, GW
GOLIN, AL
BERGSMA, CJ
STONE, TE
WILSON, PR
REICHARDT, BA
LOBERT, PF
LOCKE, CS
机构
[1] WESTSHORE UROL PROFESS CORP,MUSKEGON,MI
[2] HACKLEY HOSP,DEPT PATHOL,MUSKEGON,MI 49443
关键词
PROSTATE; NEOPLASMS; US STUDIES;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.178.1.1984305
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The biologic aggressiveness of palpable versus nonpalpable prostate cancer was evaluated in 666 patients studied with endosonography over a 24-month period. Biologic aggressiveness was defined by a combined histologic and grade-stage category score. In 314 patients suspected of having prostate cancer 328 biopsies were performed. Carcinoma was detected in 99 patients, by means of both palpation and endosonography (n = 80), endosonography alone (n = 9), and palpation alone (n = 8); two cancers were not detected with either palpation or endosonography. All patients with normal results of digital examination had a combined grade-stage category score lower than 9. Fifty-five of 69 patients (80%) with abnormal results of digital examination and available histologic data had a histologic score of 6 or higher; 38 of these patients (69%) had a combined grade-stage category score of 9 or higher. Although the number of patients is small, these data suggest that nonpalpable cancers are biologically less aggressive than palpable ones and that the advantage of endosonography over palpation in detection of clinically significant cancers is limited.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 206
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   STANDARDIZED ENDOSONOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF PROSTATE-CANCER - RECEIVER-OPERATOR-CHARACTERISTIC ANALYSIS [J].
BARAN, GW ;
GOLIN, A ;
BERGSMA, C ;
STONE, T ;
WILSON, P ;
REICHARDT, B ;
LOBERT, P ;
LOCKE, CS ;
CARLSON, JC ;
HOLLY, LE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1987, 149 (05) :975-980
[2]   PATHOLOGICAL FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE PROGNOSIS IN STAGE A PROSTATIC-CANCER - THE INFLUENCE OF EXTENT VERSUS GRADE [J].
CANTRELL, BB ;
DEKLERK, DP ;
EGGLESTON, JC ;
BOITNOTT, JK ;
WALSH, PC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1981, 125 (04) :516-520
[3]   GRADING ERRORS IN PROSTATIC NEEDLE BIOPSIES - RELATION TO THE ACCURACY OF TUMOR GRADE IN PREDICTING PELVIC LYMPH-NODE METASTASES [J].
CATALONA, WJ ;
STEIN, AJ ;
FAIR, WR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1982, 127 (05) :919-922
[4]  
COOPER JF, 1980, UROL CLIN N AM, V7, P653
[5]   LATENT CARCINOMA OF PROSTATE - WHY CONTROVERSY [J].
CORREA, RJ ;
ANDERSON, RG ;
GIBBONS, RP ;
MASON, JT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1974, 111 (05) :644-646
[6]  
DAHNERT WF, 1986, RADIOLOGY, V158, P97
[7]   THE PREVALENCE OF CANCER - ESTIMATES BASED ON THE CONNECTICUT-TUMOR-REGISTRY [J].
FELDMAN, AR ;
KESSLER, L ;
MYERS, MH ;
NAUGHTON, MD .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1986, 315 (22) :1394-1397
[8]   THE ACCURACY OF DIAGNOSTIC-BIOPSY SPECIMENS IN PREDICTING TUMOR GRADES BY GLEASON CLASSIFICATION OF RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENS [J].
GARNETT, JE ;
OYASU, R ;
GRAYHACK, JT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1984, 131 (04) :690-693
[9]  
GLEASON DF, 1988, PROSTATE CANCER MONO, V7, P15
[10]   PROGNOSIS OF CLINICALLY UNDIAGNOSED PROSTATIC CARCINOMA AND INFLUENCE OF ENDOCRINE THERAPY [J].
HEANEY, JA ;
CHANG, HC ;
DALY, JJ ;
PROUT, GR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1977, 118 (02) :283-287