AN IMPROVED ANALYSIS OF GRAVITY DRAINAGE EXPERIMENTS FOR ESTIMATING THE UNSATURATED SOIL HYDRAULIC FUNCTIONS

被引:29
作者
SISSON, JB [1 ]
VANGENUCHTEN, MT [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA,ARS,US SALIN LAB,RIVERSIDE,CA 92501
关键词
D O I
10.1029/91WR00184
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The unsaturated hydraulic properties are important parameters in any quantitative description of water and solute transport in partially saturated soils. Currently, most in situ methods for estimating the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity (K) are based on analyses that require estimates of the soil water flux and the pressure head gradient. These analyses typically involve differencing of field-measured pressure head (h) and volumetric water content (theta) data, a process that can significantly amplify instrumental and measurement errors. More reliable methods result when differencing of field data can be avoided. One such method is based on estimates of the gravity drainage curve K'(theta) = dK/d-theta which may be computed from observations of theta and/or h during the drainage phase of infiltration drainage experiments assuming unit gradient hydraulic conditions. The purpose of this study was to compare estimates of the unsaturated soil hydraulic functions on the basis of different combinations of field data theta, h, K, and K'. Five different data sets were used for the analysis: (1) theta-h, (2) K-theta, (3) K'-theta; (4) K-theta-h, and (5) K'-theta-h. The analysis was applied to previously published data for the Norfolk, Troup, and Bethany soils. The K-theta-h and K'-theta-h data sets consistently produced nearly identical estimates of the hydraulic functions. The k-theta and K'-theta data also resulted in similar curves, although results in this case were less consistent than those produced by the K-theta-h and K'-theta-h data sets. We conclude from this study that differencing of field data can be avoided and hence that there is no need to calculate soil water fluxes and pressure head gradients from inherently noisy field-measured theta and h data. The gravity drainage analysis also provides results over a much broader range of hydraulic conductivity values than is possible with the more standard instantaneous profile analysis, especially when augmented with independently measured soil water retention data.
引用
收藏
页码:569 / 575
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   A SIMPLIFIED FUNCTIONS APPROACH FOR DETERMINING SOIL HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITIES AND WATER CHARACTERISTICS INSITU [J].
AHUJA, LR ;
GREEN, RE ;
CHONG, SK ;
NIELSEN, DR .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1980, 16 (05) :947-953
[2]   PREDICTION OF EVAPORATION, DRAINAGE, AND SOIL WATER STORAGE FOR A BARE SOIL [J].
BLACK, TA ;
GARDNER, WR ;
THURTELL, GW .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA PROCEEDINGS, 1969, 33 (05) :655-&
[3]  
BROOKS RH, 1964, 3 COL STAT U HYDR PA
[4]   SIMPLE INSITU DETERMINATION OF HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY BY POWER FUNCTION DESCRIPTIONS OF DRAINAGE [J].
CHONG, SK ;
GREEN, RE ;
AHUJA, LR .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1981, 17 (04) :1109-1114
[5]  
DANE JH, 1983, S COOP SER B, V262
[6]   FIELD MEASUREMENT AND USE OF SOIL-WATER PROPERTIES [J].
DAVIDSON, JM ;
STONE, LR ;
NIELSEN, DR ;
LARUE, ME .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1969, 5 (06) :1312-+
[7]   ERROR PROPAGATION IN DETERMINING HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITIES FROM SUCCESSIVE WATER CONTENT AND PRESSURE HEAD PROFILES. [J].
Fluehler, H. ;
Ardakani, M.S. ;
Stolzy, L.H. .
Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1976, 40 (06) :830-836
[8]  
GREEN RE, 1986, METHODS SOIL ANAL, V1, P771
[9]   COMPARISON OF MEASURED AND CALCULATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITIES OF UNSATURATED SOILS [J].
JACKSON, RD ;
REGINATO, RJ ;
VANBAVEL, CH .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1965, 1 (03) :375-+
[10]   INSITU ESTIMATION OF HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY USING SIMPLIFIED METHODS [J].
JONES, AJ ;
WAGENET, RJ .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1984, 20 (11) :1620-1626