USE OF THE LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO A FACE MASK DURING OUTPATIENT ARTHROSCOPY

The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) has recently become available in the United States, and several authors have suggested that it is superior to an anesthesia mask. To test this hypothesis, 64 patients undergoing outpatient arthroscopic knee surgery were randomly assigned to have anesthesia maintained via either a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) (n = 31) or a standard face mask (n = 33). Anesthesia was induced with fentanyl 1 mug.kg-1 and propofol 2 mg.kg-1 and maintained with a variable-rate propofol infusion (50-180 mug.kg-1.min) and nitrous oxide 67% in oxygen. The LMA was inserted without difficulty by inexperienced anesthesiologists in 90% of the patients. Problems associated with airway management were more common in patients in the face mask (control) group. Episodes of hemoglobin oxygen desaturation (< 95%) occurred in 52% of patients in the face mask group compared to only 13% in the LMA group (P < 0.05). Intraoperative airway manipulations were required in 15% of face mask patients (vs. 3% of the LMA group), and difficulties in maintaining an airway were reported by 24% of the resident anesthesiologists caring for patients in the face mask group (vs. none in the LMA group) (P < 0.05). Insertion of the LMA was not associated with any acute changes in hemodynamic values. Intraoperative hemodynamic values and anesthetic requirements did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups. There were no significant differences in the emergence and recovery times or in the incidence of postoperative sore throats between the two groups. In summary, the LMA appears to offer advantages over the face mask during outpatient arthroscopy under general anesthesia.