The basis for the nmr method of determining conformational equilibria in substituted cyclohexanes is examined. Comparison of conformationally analogous 3- and 4-t-butyl-substituted cyclohexyl derivatives indicates that the signals for the C1 proton therein are not the same; conformational equilibria derived from the signal position in the 4-t-butyl compounds and the corresponding monosubstituted compound (Figure 1) are consistent with similar equilibria obtained by other methods, but those derived from 3-t-butyl compounds are out of line. However, in proton resonance of 2-t-butyl- and 5-t-butyl-substituted 1,3-dioxanes, the t-butyl group does affect the signals of certain ring and methyl substituent hydrogens in positions corresponding to the 4 position in cyclohexane. In the case of 19F resonance it is found that in both 3-t-butyl- and 4-t-butyl-1,1-difluorocyclohexanes the position of the fluorine signals is affected by the alkyl substituent. Comparison of cis- and trans-4-t-butylcyclohexyl chlorides with cyclohexyl chloride at –81 to –91° as a means of ascertaining the equatorial and axial CHC signals suggests that the 4-t-butyl compounds are better suited for this purpose inasmuch as the signal position changes with temperature and an extrapolation is required to utilize the measured low-tem-perature shifts. However, 4-t-butyl compounds are apparently not good models for 19F shifts or for proton snifts in heterocyclic systems. © 1968, American Chemical Society. All rights reserved.